[gentoo-dev] Re: Dynamic dependencies

2015-10-02 Thread Martin Vaeth
Rich Freeman wrote: > > Proposal 3a might be: Anytime an RDEPEND in an eclass is changed, the > eclass must be revisioned unless all ebuilds in the gentoo repository > will continue to work correctly with the old RDEPEND. > Proposal 4a might be: Anytime an RDEPEND in an eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dynamic dependencies

2015-10-02 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Martin Vaeth wrote: > Rich Freeman wrote: >> >> Proposal 3a might be: Anytime an RDEPEND in an eclass is changed, the >> eclass must be revisioned unless all ebuilds in the gentoo repository >> will continue to work correctly

Re: [gentoo-dev] tcltk herd empty

2015-10-02 Thread Daniel Campbell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 09/30/2015 06:02 AM, Justin (jlec) wrote: > Hi, > > is no active maintainer for tcltk in Gentoo anymore. > > Please stand up or try to remove tcltk support from your packages. > > Justin > I know next to nothing about tcl/tk but it's been an

Re: [gentoo-dev] tcltk herd empty

2015-10-02 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2015-10-02, o godz. 03:38:16 Daniel Campbell napisał(a): > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 09/30/2015 06:02 AM, Justin (jlec) wrote: > > Hi, > > > > is no active maintainer for tcltk in Gentoo anymore. > > > > Please stand up or try to remove

Re: [gentoo-dev] tcltk herd empty

2015-10-02 Thread Dale
Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2015-10-02, o godz. 03:38:16 > Daniel Campbell napisał(a): > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> On 09/30/2015 06:02 AM, Justin (jlec) wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> is no active maintainer for tcltk in Gentoo anymore. >>> >>> Please

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dynamic dependencies

2015-10-02 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/10/15 03:22 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 21:11:22 +0200 Kristian Fiskerstrand > wrote: >> On 10/01/2015 09:12 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >>> On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 15:08:00 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius >>>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: moving gcc-5.2 to unstable

2015-10-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 02 Oct 2015 02:21, Ryan Hill wrote: > IMO these should be fixed before we unmask: > >546742: x11-apps/sessreg-1.1.0 fail to build with gcc5 >547626: dev-lang/python-3.3 / 3.4 test_faulthandler hangs with GCC 5.1 >547950: app-shells/zsh-5.0.7-r2 builds but has runtime errors with

Re: [gentoo-dev] tcltk herd empty

2015-10-02 Thread Philip Webb
Daniel Campbell napisał(a): > I know next to nothing about tcl/tk but it's been an idle curiosity. > Are there any particularly important packages that run on them? All my pkgs which requre it have USE flag 'tk' set (compare Dale's list). I have it set in make.conf for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: moving gcc-5.2 to unstable

2015-10-02 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 09:49:47 -0400 > Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> what do people want to have in place before we move gcc-5.2 into ~arch ? >> >> the general list looks pretty good: >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] tcltk herd empty

2015-10-02 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 13:42:37 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > > I know next to nothing about tcl/tk but it's been an idle curiosity > > of mine. Are there any particularly important packages that run on > > them? > > dev-tcltk/expect is sometimes used for modem chats. > >

[gentoo-dev] Re: moving gcc-5.2 to unstable

2015-10-02 Thread Ryan Hill
On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 09:49:47 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > what do people want to have in place before we move gcc-5.2 into ~arch ? > > the general list looks pretty good: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/536984 IMO these should be fixed before we unmask: 546742:

[gentoo-dev] repoman and useless dependency.badmasked warnings

2015-10-02 Thread Mike Gilbert
Hello, I am getting the output below when I run repoman full for sys-apps/systemd. It is basically telling me that systemd (which is masked in the selinux profiles) cannot depend on sys-apps/dbus[systemd], because the systemd use flag is also masked. That's perfectly fine and I suppose it is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: moving gcc-5.2 to unstable

2015-10-02 Thread Brian Evans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/2/2015 10:27 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Ryan Hill > wrote: >> On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 09:49:47 -0400 Mike Frysinger >> wrote: I think we need a news item to remind >> people they

[gentoo-dev] getting openssl SLOT right

2015-10-02 Thread hasufell
While adding libressl support I encountered a lot of ebuilds that do stuff like: ssl? ( dev-libs/openssl ) There are very few cases where this is actually correct. FYI: # cave contents dev-libs/openssl:0.9.8 /usr/lib64 /usr/lib64/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 /usr/lib64/libssl.so.0.9.8 There are no

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman and useless dependency.badmasked warnings

2015-10-02 Thread Jason Zaman
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 10:49:48AM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > Hello, > > I am getting the output below when I run repoman full for sys-apps/systemd. > > It is basically telling me that systemd (which is masked in the > selinux profiles) cannot depend on sys-apps/dbus[systemd], because the >

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: openrc localmount and netmount changes (third iteration)

2015-10-02 Thread Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 William Hubbs schrieb: | Display-If-Installed: <=sys-fs/openrc-0.18 That should be sys-apps/openrc, no? Best regards, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguy?n -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman and useless dependency.badmasked warnings

2015-10-02 Thread Zac Medico
On 10/02/2015 09:50 AM, Jason Zaman wrote: > What I do not understand, I see these for hardened/../no-multilib, but I > do not see anything for default/.../no-multilib. Why? as far as I can > tell, they are masked in the same way so why isnt it complaining about > default? If you don't use

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v3] unpack: use chmod-lite helper for bug 554084

2015-10-02 Thread Zac Medico
Use the apply_recursive_permissions function to minimize the number of chmod calls. Also, fix an UnboundLocalError triggered in portage.data._get_global by chmod-lite. X-Gentoo-Bug: 554084 X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554084 --- [PATCH v3] fixes

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman and useless dependency.badmasked warnings

2015-10-02 Thread Zac Medico
On 10/02/2015 07:49 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > Hello, > > I am getting the output below when I run repoman full for sys-apps/systemd. > > It is basically telling me that systemd (which is masked in the > selinux profiles) cannot depend on sys-apps/dbus[systemd], because the > systemd use flag is

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] unpack: use chmod-lite helper for bug 554084

2015-10-02 Thread Zac Medico
Use the apply_recursive_permissions function to minimize the number of chmod calls. Also, fix an UnboundLocalError triggered in portage.data._get_global by chmod-lite. X-Gentoo-Bug: 554084 X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554084 --- [PATCH v2] fixes

[gentoo-dev] rfc: removing mount-ro from OpenRC

2015-10-02 Thread William Hubbs
All, it has come up in discussion of how to handle aufs file systems (or maybe how not to) that /etc/init.d/mount-ro may be able to be removed from OpenRC [1]. Does anyone know why we need this init script (it is Linux only), or why we can't remove it? William [1]

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman and useless dependency.badmasked warnings

2015-10-02 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 13:08:29 -0700 Zac Medico wrote: > On 10/02/2015 07:49 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I am getting the output below when I run repoman full for > > sys-apps/systemd. > > > > It is basically telling me that systemd (which is masked in the > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: removing mount-ro from OpenRC

2015-10-02 Thread Patrick McLean
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 16:59:06 -0500 William Hubbs wrote: > > Does anyone know why we need this init script (it is Linux only), or > why we can't remove it? > This script is there to make sure as much effort as possible has been done to prevent file system corruption before

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman and useless dependency.badmasked warnings

2015-10-02 Thread Zac Medico
On 10/02/2015 04:40 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 13:08:29 -0700 > Zac Medico wrote: > >> On 10/02/2015 07:49 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am getting the output below when I run repoman full for >>> sys-apps/systemd. >>> >>> It is basically

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH] unpack: use chmod-lite helper for bug 554084

2015-10-02 Thread Zac Medico
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Zac Medico wrote: > Use the apply_recursive_permissions function to minimize the number of > chmod calls. Actually, apply_recursive_permissions fails with www-apache/mod_auth_token-1.0.6_beta, so it needs some work.

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman and useless dependency.badmasked warnings

2015-10-02 Thread Jason Zaman
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 01:03:49PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote: > On 10/02/2015 09:50 AM, Jason Zaman wrote: > > What I do not understand, I see these for hardened/../no-multilib, but I > > do not see anything for default/.../no-multilib. Why? as far as I can > > tell, they are masked in the same way

[gentoo-dev] Re: gcc-5 news item wrt C++ ABI

2015-10-02 Thread Ryan Hill
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 22:13:09 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > Title: GCC 5 Defaults to the New C++11 ABI > Author: Mike Frysinger > Content-Type: text/plain > Posted: 2015-10-02 > Revision: 1 > News-Item-Format: 1.0 > Display-If-Installed: >=sys-devel/gcc-5 >

Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-5 news item wrt C++ ABI

2015-10-02 Thread Jason Zaman
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 10:13:09PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > Title: GCC 5 Defaults to the New C++11 ABI > Author: Mike Frysinger > Content-Type: text/plain > Posted: 2015-10-02 > Revision: 1 > News-Item-Format: 1.0 > Display-If-Installed: >=sys-devel/gcc-5 > > GCC 5 uses

[gentoo-dev] gcc-5 news item wrt C++ ABI

2015-10-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
Title: GCC 5 Defaults to the New C++11 ABI Author: Mike Frysinger Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2015-10-02 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 1.0 Display-If-Installed: >=sys-devel/gcc-5 GCC 5 uses the new C++ ABI by default. When building new code, you might run into link time