Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH] depgraph._resolve: consider unresolved @system atoms fatal (bug 568354)

2015-12-16 Thread Zac Medico
On 12/16/2015 05:35 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote: > On 16/12/15 04:31, Zac Medico wrote: >> On 12/15/2015 12:46 PM, Zac Medico wrote: >>> Since @system atoms are presumably chosen by someone who knows what >>> they are doing (usually a gentoo developer), it makes sense to consider >>> resolution

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Old news items

2015-12-16 Thread Zac Medico
On 12/16/2015 08:26 AM, Michael Palimaka wrote: > On a fresh amd64 stage3 a user is presented with fourteen news items to > read, and three[1][2][3] of these are directly related to Portage. > > In order to improve the out-of-box experience, please review them for > relevance and consider

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] egencache: add --stable-mtime option

2015-12-16 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 14:38:03 +0100 Alexander Berntsen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 16/12/15 06:33, Zac Medico wrote: > > Disable Manifest "stable mtime" behavior by default, and add a > > corresponding egencache option. > This message

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: openrc c api (librc) usage

2015-12-16 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/16/2015 01:44 AM, Duncan wrote: >> >> look at the RDEPEND in ebuilds. if a package uses the libs, it should >> be listed there. > > Even with openrc still in @system? Doesn't look like that bug has been > fixed yet.[1] > No one agrees on which @system packages can be omitted from

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: openrc c api (librc) usage

2015-12-16 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 16 Dec 2015 06:44, Duncan wrote: > Mike Frysinger posted on Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:00:51 -0500 as excerpted: > > On 10 Dec 2015 10:32, William Hubbs wrote: > >> I want to start a discussion about the usage of OpenRC's C api as > >> defined in rc.h. > > > > very few projects ever picked up the

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH] depgraph._resolve: consider unresolved @system atoms fatal (bug 568354)

2015-12-16 Thread Alexander Berntsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 16/12/15 04:31, Zac Medico wrote: > On 12/15/2015 12:46 PM, Zac Medico wrote: >> Since @system atoms are presumably chosen by someone who knows what >> they are doing (usually a gentoo developer), it makes sense to consider >> resolution failures

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] repoman: use metadata.dtd from rsync tree if available (bug 567746)

2015-12-16 Thread Alexander Berntsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 LGTM. - -- Alexander berna...@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWcWrfAAoJENQqWdRUGk8BmAsQALl6yvoA9QJBn9TcmxENI8L4

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] egencache: add --stable-mtime option

2015-12-16 Thread Alexander Berntsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 16/12/15 06:33, Zac Medico wrote: > Disable Manifest "stable mtime" behavior by default, and add a > corresponding egencache option. This message tells me nothing about why we need to do this. - -- Alexander berna...@gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: converting copyright/license information in OpenRC

2015-12-16 Thread Alexander Berntsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 16/12/15 13:39, Rich Freeman wrote: > I don't see how this is dishonest. You answered this yourself, > They'll just be credited side-by-side with everybody else in once > place. - -- Alexander berna...@gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: converting copyright/license information in OpenRC

2015-12-16 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 16/12/15 13:39, Rich Freeman wrote: >> I don't see how this is dishonest. > You answered this yourself, > >> They'll just be credited side-by-side with

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: converting copyright/license information in OpenRC

2015-12-16 Thread Alexander Berntsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I agree with Mike that this isn't kosher. It just isn't honest. On 15/12/15 20:37, William Hubbs wrote: > Multiple entries are what I want to get away from; it is a > nightmare to maintain, and the vcs shows far better than you or I > ever could

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: converting copyright/license information in OpenRC

2015-12-16 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 6:43 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote: > > I agree with Mike that this isn't kosher. It just isn't honest. > I don't really have a horse in this race, but I don't see how this is dishonest. What is being proposed is moving from attribution scattered all

[gentoo-portage-dev] Old news items

2015-12-16 Thread Michael Palimaka
On a fresh amd64 stage3 a user is presented with fourteen news items to read, and three[1][2][3] of these are directly related to Portage. In order to improve the out-of-box experience, please review them for relevance and consider removing or restricting any that are not. 1:

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] egencache: add --stable-mtime option

2015-12-16 Thread Zac Medico
On 12/16/2015 05:38 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 16/12/15 06:33, Zac Medico wrote: >> Disable Manifest "stable mtime" behavior by default, and add a >> corresponding egencache option. > This message tells me nothing about why we need to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: converting copyright/license information in OpenRC

2015-12-16 Thread William Hubbs
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:31:08AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Alexander Berntsen > wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA512 > > > > On 16/12/15 13:39, Rich Freeman wrote: > >> I don't see how this is dishonest. > > You