[gentoo-dev] [ANNOUNCE] genkernel 3.5.0.0 release

Hi all, This is a quick announcement of the early testing of the genkernel-3.5.0.0 release. The 3.5.0.x series should NOT be considered as stable candidates. As such, I've also removed ALL keywords from 3.5.0.0. Further 3.5.0.x releases will land other major changes hopefully, including

[gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 82 bugs

Our bug queue has 82 bugs! If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs. To view the bug queue, click here: http://bit.ly/m8PQS5 Thanks!

Re: [gentoo-dev] New USE_EXPAND NGINX_MODULES_STREAM

On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 5 lutego 2016 07:38:44 CET, Jason Zaman > napisał(a): >>On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 04:35:44PM -0600, Gordon Pettey wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 6:17 AM, Kent Fredric

Re: [gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 82 bugs

On 06/02/16 22:00, Alex Alexander wrote: > Our bug queue has 82 bugs! > > If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs. > > To view the bug queue, click here: http://bit.ly/m8PQS5 > > Thanks! > Only 82? that's not, like, 4k ... :) http://tinyurl.com/maintainer-wanted .

Re: [gentoo-dev] New virtual: virtual/jack for jack protocol implementations

On 04/02/16 15:05, Alexis Ballier wrote: > Hi, > > We've been supporting jack sound server [1] for a long time. > Currently, we're supporting jack1 as > media-sound/jack-audio-connection-kit. However, jack2 has been out for > quite some time. > > As its name does not imply, jack2 is not really

[gentoo-dev] Packages Up For Grabs

Hey, I spoke with steveeJ the maintainer of app-emulation/rkt and that package is also without a maintainer. Please, feel free to take app-emulation/rkt, and if we're still the maintainers in two weeks, I'll mark it as maintainer-needed. Short: app-emulation/rkt will be marked

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automatic Bug Assignment

On 02/06/2016 10:35 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > Automation can go further: if there are multiple maintainers, > assign bug to the first one and CC others. Which is exactly what I'm doing in my tinderbox: # get assignee and cc, GLEP 67 simplifies it # m=$(equery --no-color meta -m $curr

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automatic Bug Assignment

On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 09:09:13AM +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote: > On 01/30/2016 06:45 PM, Alex Brandt wrote: > > Hey Guys, > > > > I've oft wondered why we don't automatically assign bugs to the > > ebuild maintainer (if a CPV is in the subject). Would there be an > > issue with adding a bug

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automatic Bug Assignment

On 7 February 2016 at 04:26, William Hubbs wrote: > One concern I see with making this part of the web ui for Bugzilla is > that Bugzilla would have to be able to parse the metadata.xml files in > our portage tree to find the maintainers. You could simplify it with a cron

Re: [gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 82 bugs

On Sat, 06 Feb 2016 22:02:45 + "M. J. Everitt" wrote: > On 06/02/16 22:00, Alex Alexander wrote: > > Our bug queue has 82 bugs! > > > > If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs. > > > > To view the bug queue, click here: http://bit.ly/m8PQS5 > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automatic Bug Assignment

On 01/30/2016 06:45 PM, Alex Brandt wrote: > Hey Guys, > > I've oft wondered why we don't automatically assign bugs to the > ebuild maintainer (if a CPV is in the subject). Would there be an > issue with adding a bug modification hook to bugzilla or a daily > job to re-assign bugs to ebuild

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Automatic Bug Assignment

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/06/2016 04:43 AM, Duncan wrote: > Talking about which, I've toyed with asking for bug-assignment > privileges for awhile, but haven't known who to ask, or if the > privilege model is fine grained enough to give me that without > giving me

[gentoo-dev] Re: Automatic Bug Assignment

Patrick Lauer posted on Sat, 06 Feb 2016 09:09:13 +0100 as excerpted: > Maybe we could add a "Assign to maintainer(s)" button visible only to > certain groups of users, so that a bugwrangler who decides this bug is > valid just has to hit one button instead of figuring out the details of >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automatic Bug Assignment

On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 16:10:48 -0500 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 02/05/2016 03:47 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > > The main problem I see with auto-assignment is that some asignees end > > up being black holes for bugs. If two active devs get their bugs > > crossed it isn't a big deal since they'll just

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automatic Bug Assignment

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/05/2016 03:47 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Kent Fredric > wrote: >> On 6 February 2016 at 07:19, Rich Freeman >> wrote: >>> 'd be all for automated bug assignment.