Re: [gentoo-dev] Uncoordinated changes

2016-02-12 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:07 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > I still don't see the advantage in that. Maybe I should have expressed > my concerns more vocally, but in general I don't have time to worry > about all the little things. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: "Lazy" use flags?

2016-02-12 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:36 AM, Kent Fredric wrote: > On 12 February 2016 at 18:56, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: >> So my USE="-* ..." (without letting portage do autounmasking) would >> continue to work just like it does now, correct? > > I would hope so. That

Re: [gentoo-dev] Uncoordinated changes

2016-02-12 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 02/12/2016 08:48 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dear Ignorant Patrick, Hello human! Your politeness module seems to have crashed. And thanks for making me do a quintuple facepalm with backflip. I think that's a new record. So anyway ... > On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 21:15:34 +0100 > Patrick Lauer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: "Lazy" use flags?

2016-02-12 Thread Gordon Pettey
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:36 AM, Kent Fredric > wrote: > > On 12 February 2016 at 18:56, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > >> So my USE="-* ..." (without letting portage do autounmasking) would

Re: [gentoo-dev] Uncoordinated changes

2016-02-12 Thread Paul Varner
On 02/11/2016 07:34 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > Ultimately, the only way anybody can be assured that their favorite > Gentoo tool will work in a year is if they're maintaining it. It > sounds like nobody was really paying attention to it, which is why > nobody noticed that it was going to break.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Uncoordinated changes

2016-02-12 Thread Michał Górny
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 10:07:10 +0100 Patrick Lauer wrote: > On 02/12/2016 08:48 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > Dear Ignorant Patrick, > Hello human! Your politeness module seems to have crashed. Please do not expect politeness when you insult someone. > > On Thu, 11 Feb 2016