[gentoo-dev] Re: Changing order of default virtual/udev provider

2016-02-15 Thread Duncan
Francesco Riosa posted on Mon, 15 Feb 2016 13:13:37 +0100 as excerpted: > Neither this is totally true, or put another way, everybody which is NOT > using systemd is using eudev (or some form of static /dev). > So obviously this is totally relevant for people that don't use systemd. Not really

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: intel-sdp-r1.eclass

2016-02-15 Thread Martin Vaeth
Justin Lecher (jlec) wrote: >>> [[ -n ${_INTEL_PV4} ]] && _INTEL_PV+="${_INTEL_PV4}-" >>> [[ -n ${_INTEL_PV1} ]] && _INTEL_PV+="${_INTEL_PV1}" >>> [[ -n ${_INTEL_PV2} ]] && _INTEL_PV+=".${_INTEL_PV2}" >>> [[ -n ${_INTEL_PV3} ]] && _INTEL_PV+=".${_INTEL_PV3}" >>> [[ -n

Re: [gentoo-dev] libressl: proposing a new project and calling for help

2016-02-15 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 02/15/2016 01:20 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 10:38 PM, Anthony G. Basile > wrote: >> We discussed the state of libressl today in the council. >> Proceeding forward with that work, I'm going to propose a new >> project and getting together a

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: intel-sdp-r1.eclass

2016-02-15 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:41:58 +0100 "Justin Lecher (jlec)" wrote: > On 15/02/16 15:35, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:37:41 +0100 > > "Justin Lecher (jlec)" wrote: > > > >> On 15/02/16 13:59, Michał Górny wrote: > >>> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider

2016-02-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 15 Feb 2016 13:13, Francesco Riosa wrote: > Also, why, why people using systemd ARE interested in this thread? > You should not be interested at all. in case you're directing at me, i do not use systemd anywhere -mike signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: intel-sdp-r1.eclass

2016-02-15 Thread Justin Lecher (jlec)
On 15/02/16 15:35, Michał Górny wrote: > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:37:41 +0100 > "Justin Lecher (jlec)" wrote: > >> On 15/02/16 13:59, Michał Górny wrote: >>> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:16:53 +0100 >>> "Justin Lecher (jlec)" wrote: >>> # @ECLASS-VARIABLE:

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: intel-sdp-r1.eclass

2016-02-15 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:37:41 +0100 "Justin Lecher (jlec)" wrote: > On 15/02/16 13:59, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:16:53 +0100 > > "Justin Lecher (jlec)" wrote: > > > >> # @ECLASS-VARIABLE: INTEL_SUBDIR > >> # @DEFAULT_UNSET > >> #

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: intel-sdp-r1.eclass

2016-02-15 Thread Justin Lecher (jlec)
On 15/02/16 13:59, Michał Górny wrote: > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:16:53 +0100 > "Justin Lecher (jlec)" wrote: > >> # Copyright 1999-2016 Gentoo Foundation >> # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 >> # $Id$ >> >> # @ECLASS: intel-sdp-r1.eclass >> #

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: intel-sdp-r1.eclass

2016-02-15 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:16:53 +0100 "Justin Lecher (jlec)" wrote: > # Copyright 1999-2016 Gentoo Foundation > # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 > # $Id$ > > # @ECLASS: intel-sdp-r1.eclass > # @MAINTAINER: > # Justin Lecher > #

Re: [gentoo-dev] libressl: proposing a new project and calling for help

2016-02-15 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 10:38 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > We discussed the state of libressl today in the council. Proceeding > forward with that work, I'm going to propose a new project and getting > together a team. Much of the work has already done by hasufell and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider

2016-02-15 Thread Francesco Riosa
2016-02-14 21:23 GMT+01:00 Mike Frysinger : > On 14 Feb 2016 11:41, Brian Dolbec wrote: > > On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 11:00:30 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > > > If, for any reason, eudev should be abandoned - we can just

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider

2016-02-15 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 19:34:52 -0600 > William Hubbs wrote: > >> And, as for right now, udev-229 is in the tree, so udev can still be >> extracted and run standalone from systemd. > > and even with

Re: [gentoo-dev] libressl: proposing a new project and calling for help

2016-02-15 Thread Andreas K. Hüttel
On Sunday 14 February 2016 22:38:19 Anthony G. Basile wrote: > Hi everyone, > > We discussed the state of libressl today in the council. Proceeding > forward with that work, I'm going to propose a new project and getting > together a team. Much of the work has already done by hasufell and what

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider

2016-02-15 Thread Lars Wendler
On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 13:10:07 +0100 Patrick Lauer wrote: >On 02/09/2016 01:17 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 3:43 AM, Kent Fredric >> wrote: >>> And a lot of Gentoo is surprisingly simple: Like our use of bash >>> scripts for recipies to build things,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider

2016-02-15 Thread Daniel Campbell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/15/2016 01:29 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 19:34:52 -0600 William Hubbs > wrote: > >> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 03:50:38PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> On 14 Feb 2016 15:47, Anthony G. Basile wrote:

[gentoo-dev] RFC: intel-sdp-r1.eclass

2016-02-15 Thread Justin Lecher (jlec)
Hi everyone, We (actually mostly soap) rewrote parts of the intel-sdp.eclass and decided to revbump it. Please review our changes. Changes are: * Move from EAPI=5 to 6 * Adopt to changed packaging layout * Use ABI_ instead of multilib * Drop eclipse support * Require all RPM lists to be arrays