On 23 Apr 2016 11:39, David Seifert wrote:
please don't top post
> I generally prefer using -std=gnu89 instead of -fgnu89-inline, as GCC might
> change some C11 semantics later on. To me -std=gnu89 seems more robust.
perhaps, but other than gnu-inline behavior, it seems to be fine.
if we hit
Fix ArchChecks to not mix arches of ebuilds together, so that
errors are only reported for those arches that the ebuild has
keywords for.
---
Applies to the *repoman* branch.
pym/repoman/modules/scan/arches/arches.py | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
I generally prefer using -std=gnu89 instead of -fgnu89-inline, as GCC might
change some C11 semantics later on. To me -std=gnu89 seems more robust.
David
> On 22 Apr 2016, at 23:39, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> On 22 Apr 2016 03:57, Leno Hou wrote:
>> +-extern inline UInt32
1) We faced unable read SONAME from ${lib} when emerge below packages
platform pacakge elibtoolized
ppc64leapp-text/opensp no
ppc64ledev-libs/expat yes
ppc64lenet-firewall/iptables yes
# Alex Brandt (23 Apr 2016)
# Contains collisions with dev-python/ipaddress. See #580388 for more
details.
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
dev-python/py2-ipaddress
--
Alex Brandt
Software Developer for Rackspace and Developer for Gentoo
http://blog.alunduil.com
On 22 Apr 2016 03:57, Leno Hou wrote:
> +-extern inline UInt32 blockiter_curr(blockiter *b)
> +-{
> +-return b->e->start_block + b->block;
> +-}
> +-
> +-
> ++extern inline UInt32 blockiter_curr(blockiter *b);
i don't think that's how you want to handle extern inline.
it doesn't make sense
thanks, i've added elibtoolize calls to acl & attr now
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=d9e18bcb8f8bcaa6b3e5543caf16a684e7dacd21
-mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 22 Apr 2016 03:44, Leno Hou wrote:
> 2) The problem is due to the wrong $LD="ld -m elf64ppc" when link.
> This patch sets $LD="ld -m elf64lppc" in m4/libtool.m4 on ppc64le.
i'm looking at the upstream libtool project and i'm not seeing
these changes in there. have you sent patches to them