[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Masterplan for solving LINGUAS problems

Daniel Campbell posted on Tue, 31 May 2016 10:31:22 -0700 as excerpted: > I think this idea has some potential, but would there be a way for a > user to choose L10N *or* INSTALL_MASK instead of both? If I understand > correctly, a person who wanted all of their system to be en_US only, but >

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Masterplan for solving LINGUAS problems

Andrew Savchenko posted on Tue, 31 May 2016 20:08:10 +0300 as excerpted: > If we are going to do an instant move from LINGUAS to L10N (no graced > period as discussed here on another thread), why to rename variable in > the first place? Because the LINGUAS var is hopelessly tangled up in various

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Masterplan for solving LINGUAS problems

2016-06-01 0:03 GMT+02:00 Mike Gilbert : > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Jörg Schaible > wrote: > > How can I select different linguas for individual packages with this > > approach? > > Why would you want to? > > In addition to Jörg Schaible

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [RFC] Masterplan for solving LINGUAS problems

Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Jörg Schaible > wrote: >> How can I select different linguas for individual packages with this >> approach? > > Why would you want to? As programmer I am used to read English manuals and for most command line tools

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Masterplan for solving LINGUAS problems

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > How can I select different linguas for individual packages with this > approach? Why would you want to?

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Masterplan for solving LINGUAS problems

How can I select different linguas for individual packages with this approach? Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, everyone. > > Since the previous thread doesn't seem to have brought any good > solution to the problem other than stopping to (ab)use LINGUAS > as USE_EXPAND, I would like to start a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Masterplan for solving LINGUAS problems

On Tue, 31 May 2016 23:34:07 +0200 Jörg Schaible wrote: > How can I select different linguas for individual packages with this > approach? You could probably set INSTALL_MASK and L10N via /etc/portage/package.env. -- James Le Cuirot (chewi) Gentoo Linux Developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Masterplan for solving LINGUAS problems

On 05/31/2016 10:31 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 05/31/2016 05:49 AM, Michał Górny wrote: >> Hello, everyone. >> >> Since the previous thread doesn't seem to have brought any good >> solution to the problem other than stopping to (ab)use LINGUAS >> as USE_EXPAND, I would like to start a RFC on

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Masterplan for solving LINGUAS problems

On 05/31/2016 05:49 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, everyone. > > Since the previous thread doesn't seem to have brought any good > solution to the problem other than stopping to (ab)use LINGUAS > as USE_EXPAND, I would like to start a RFC on a draft solution that > I'd like afterwards to

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Masterplan for solving LINGUAS problems

Hi, On Tue, 31 May 2016 14:49:26 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, everyone. > > Since the previous thread doesn't seem to have brought any good > solution to the problem other than stopping to (ab)use LINGUAS > as USE_EXPAND, I would like to start a RFC on a draft solution that > I'd like

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 4/3] portage.package.ebuild.config: Support path groups from install-mask.conf

--- .../package/ebuild/_config/InstallMaskManager.py | 59 ++ pym/portage/package/ebuild/config.py | 34 - pym/portage/util/configparser.py | 19 ++- 3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Remove unneeded native_kwargs wrapper

On Tue, 24 May 2016 11:08:44 +0200 Alexander Berntsen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Welp that took forever to read through... I didn't see anything wrong > with it. So if tests pass and everything looks OK to you, go ahead and > push it.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] git-r3.eclass: Support checking out repo by date, #510704

On Thu, 26 May 2016 14:08:26 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > --- > eclass/git-r3.eclass | 69 > +++- > 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) Merged. -- Best regards, Michał Górny

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Masterplan for solving LINGUAS problems

On Tue, 31 May 2016 14:53:36 +0200 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > Michał Górny schrieb: > > Request changing LINGUAS to L10N > > in make.conf, and make LINGUAS considered an 'advanced variable' for > > implicit localization control (i.e. passed through to build

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Masterplan for solving LINGUAS problems

Michał Górny schrieb: Request changing LINGUAS to L10N in make.conf, and make LINGUAS considered an 'advanced variable' for implicit localization control (i.e. passed through to build systems). Recommend clean INSTALL_MASK solution instead. Can we have this change happen (semi-)automatically,

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Masterplan for solving LINGUAS problems

Hello, everyone. Since the previous thread doesn't seem to have brought any good solution to the problem other than stopping to (ab)use LINGUAS as USE_EXPAND, I would like to start a RFC on a draft solution that I'd like afterwards to propose to the Council. Rationale - The direct

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: kde-apps/superkaramba

# Johannes Huber (31 May 2016) # Masked for removal in 30 days. Declared as dead by # upstream in 2015. Last release with KDE Applications 15.08.3. # Exported to user maintained overlay kde-sunset. kde-apps/superkaramba signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs

On Tue, 31 May 2016 08:43:55 +0800 (HKT) Brendan Horan wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently the proxy maintainer for app-arch/snappy. > I no longer have the time/interest to proxy maintain this. > I wish to be removed from the metadata.xml. > > It has one open bug : >