Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH] man/portage.5: document -* in profile "packages" files (bug 610670)

2017-05-27 Thread Zac Medico
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Martin Vaeth wrote: > Zac Medico wrote: > > The -* wildcard has been supported since portage-2.3.4, but it was > > not explicitly documented. > > Shouldn't this be -** to remove all _system_ packages? > Or does -* really

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH] man/portage.5: document -* in profile "packages" files (bug 610670)

2017-05-27 Thread Martin Vaeth
Zac Medico wrote: > The -* wildcard has been supported since portage-2.3.4, but it was > not explicitly documented. Shouldn't this be -** to remove all _system_ packages? Or does -* really mean to remove only _profile_ packages? Or does -* remove all profile _and_ system

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] man/portage.5: document -* in profile "packages" files (bug 610670)

2017-05-27 Thread Zac Medico
The -* wildcard has been supported since portage-2.3.4, but it was not explicitly documented. X-Gentoo-Bug: 610670 X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=610670 --- man/portage.5 | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/man/portage.5

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCHES] python-r1.eclass: any-of dep API support

2017-05-27 Thread Daniel Campbell
On 05/20/2017 06:30 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > Please review. > > -- > Best regards, > Michał Górny > > It looks much as you mentioned it'd be: moving code around and cutting down duplication. Looks good to me. I really appreciate the example in patch 7, which makes it a little more clear

[gentoo-dev] php-pear-lib-r1.eclass Deprecation and removal notice

2017-05-27 Thread Brian Evans
I have just marked php-pear-lib-r1 as DEAD in the Gentoo repository. This eclass has a call in pkg_setup which many packages used ${FILESDIR} to reference a file needed to add a channel to php's pear system. Recently, changes in portage causes all packages depending on it in this way to fail as

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Restricted version of gentoo-dev mailing list

2017-05-27 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 05/24/2017 12:24 PM, Michał Górny wrote: Yes, I *do not want feedback* on *how to do Gentoo* from people who do *not help me do Gentoo* but instead only complain and demand. But you do gentoo wrong, so as a user I'd like you to reconsider what you wrote there and maybe take a long

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Restricted version of gentoo-dev mailing list

2017-05-27 Thread Daniel Campbell
On 05/23/2017 12:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > [snip] > Your comments? > Since it's adding a list instead of warping an existing one, I say go ahead on the condition that everything important finds its way to a more open list. I'm subscribed to enough as it is. I am skeptical that it will lead