[gentoo-dev] Re: News Item v2: Portage rsync tree verification unstable

Zac Medico posted on Sat, 10 Mar 2018 15:16:29 -0800 as excerpted: > Changes: > * First paragraph rewritten by Robin Johnson > * Fixes spelling of 'following' reported by Michael Everitt > > > Title: Portage rsync tree verification unstable > Author: Zac Medico >

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

On 03/11/2018 12:12 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > This packages are now up for grabs: ... > net-irc/unrealircd I can take this one.

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-i18n/libguess

# Andreas Sturmlechner (11 Mar 2018) # Dead upstream, no revdeps left. Bug #639358 app-i18n/libguess

[gentoo-dev] News Item v2: Portage rsync tree verification unstable

Changes: * First paragraph rewritten by Robin Johnson * Fixes spelling of 'following' reported by Michael Everitt Title: Portage rsync tree verification unstable Author: Zac Medico Posted: 2018-03-13 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 2.0 Display-If-Installed:

Re: [gentoo-dev] News Item: Portage rsync tree verification unstable

On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 01:22:49PM -0800, Zac Medico wrote: > Please review. This is needed in order to resolve > https://bugs.gentoo.org/650072. > > Title: Portage rsync tree verification unstable > Author: Zac Medico > Posted: 2018-03-13 > Revision: 1 > News-Item-Format:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

I'll take dev-python/typing if nobody minds. On Saturday, 10 March 2018 17:52:21 MSK Pacho Ramos wrote: > This packages are now up for grabs: > app-text/pspdftool > app-admin/supernova > dev-python/args > dev-python/attrdict > dev-python/behave > dev-python/clint > dev-python/dockerpty >

Re: [gentoo-dev] News Item: Portage rsync tree verification unstable

On 03/10/2018 01:42 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > W dniu sob, 10.03.2018 o godzinie 13∶22 -0800, użytkownik Zac Medico > napisał: >> Please review. This is needed in order to resolve >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/650072. >> >> Title: Portage rsync tree verification unstable >> Author: Zac Medico

Re: [gentoo-dev] News Item: Portage rsync tree verification unstable

W dniu sob, 10.03.2018 o godzinie 13∶22 -0800, użytkownik Zac Medico napisał: > Please review. This is needed in order to resolve > https://bugs.gentoo.org/650072. > > Title: Portage rsync tree verification unstable > Author: Zac Medico > Posted: 2018-03-13 > Revision: 1 >

Re: [gentoo-dev] News Item: Portage rsync tree verification unstable

On 10/03/18 21:22, Zac Medico wrote: > Please review. This is needed in order to resolve > https://bugs.gentoo.org/650072. > 2) Once the 'rsync-verify' USE flag has been unmasked as described > in step 1, it can be enabled with a line like the folling in > /etc/portage/package.use:

[gentoo-dev] News Item: Portage rsync tree verification unstable

Please review. This is needed in order to resolve https://bugs.gentoo.org/650072. Title: Portage rsync tree verification unstable Author: Zac Medico Posted: 2018-03-13 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 2.0 Display-If-Installed: sys-apps/portage Starting with

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 18-03-10 15:52:21, Pacho Ramos wrote: > This packages are now up for grabs: > app-text/pspdftool > app-admin/supernova > dev-python/args > dev-python/attrdict > dev-python/behave > dev-python/clint > dev-python/dockerpty > dev-python/doublex-expects > dev-python/doublex > dev-python/expects >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 10/03/18 14:52, Pacho Ramos wrote: > This packages are now up for grabs: > ... > dev-python/mypy > ... I can look after this one if nobody else wants it? Mike 5:) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

This packages are now up for grabs: dev-embedded/mcu8051ide

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

This packages are now up for grabs: x11-misc/kbdd x11-themes/comix-xcursors

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

This packages are now up for grabs: app-text/pspdftool app-admin/supernova dev-python/args dev-python/attrdict dev-python/behave dev-python/clint dev-python/dockerpty dev-python/doublex-expects dev-python/doublex dev-python/expects dev-python/ghp-import dev-python/linecache2 dev-python/livereload

[gentoo-dev] Project:Lisp without members

>From now Project:Lisp has no members... that doesn't seem an issue as it contains multiple subprojects that maintain relevant packages... but, for the case anyone wants to join the main project... https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Lisp

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

This packages are now up for grabs: dev-lang/gnu-smalltalk x11-misc/fluxter x11-themes/commonbox-styles-extra x11-themes/commonbox-styles x11-themes/fluxbox-styles-fluxmod x11-wm/fluxbox

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

This packages are now up for grabs: app-text/pspdftool sys-power/acpid x11-libs/libyui-gtk x11-libs/libyui x11-libs/libyui-ncurses x11-libs/libyui-qt

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

This packages are now up for grabs: app-portage/repo-commit dev-libs/libstrl net-irc/unrealircd

[gentoo-dev] Project:SuSE without members

>From now Project:SuSE has no members anymore, they maintain this packages (that will go to maintainer-needed in a week if Project is still without members at that time) Thanks app-arch/rpm app-backup/kfoldersync app-backup/snapper app-benchmarks/os-autoinst app-text/diction dev-lang/inform

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

This packages are now up for grabs: app-editors/xmlcopyeditor app-pda/barry dev-libs/chmlib dev-util/ftjam net-p2p/nicotine+

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

This packages are now up for grabs: app-crypt/kali-archive-keyring net-wireless/orinoco-fwutils x11-terms/tilda

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proliferation of IUSE=static-libs in Gentoo

On 03/08/2018 10:40 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > So, developers, please *stop adding USE=static-libs* to random libraries > that have no reason whatever to be statically linked to. And by that I > mean a good reason, not creeping featurism, not 'user asked for it', not > 'this broken package

Re: [gentoo-dev] Integrating Portage with other package managers

On Wed, 7 Mar 2018 14:55:43 -0600 R0b0t1 wrote: > I think you missed my point: Why are they easier to use? Because it decouples your projects requirements from your OS and Vendor requirements. This becomes really useful if your OS/Vendor wishes to upgrade things and force

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/8] linux-info.eclass: linux-info_get_any_version, die on failure

W dniu sob, 10.03.2018 o godzinie 01∶05 +, użytkownik Robin H. Johnson napisał: > On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 06:05:43PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > > Make linux-info_get_any_version die if it can't determine any version > > of the Linux kernel. This indicates a problem with the eclass code > >