[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2018-03-18 23:59 UTC

The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2018-03-18 23:59 UTC. Removals: media-gfx/qiviewer 20180314-06:47 zlogene 60477a6ac8f media-gfx/yafaray 20180315-15:23 asturm 752d52974e3

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/3] INSTALL_MASK refurbishing resubmit

On 03/18/2018 02:03 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > W dniu czw, 15.03.2018 o godzinie 22∶10 -0700, użytkownik Zac Medico > napisał: >> A binary package should >> use the value of INSTALL_MASK that existed at build time. >> > > Wait a minute! This doesn't make any sense. The whole point of having >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrites: net-dns/hesiod, games-arcade/monkey-bubble, app-shells/scsh-install-lib, dev-db/mysql-udf-infusion...

On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 8:49 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > # Pacho Ramos (18 Mar 2018) > # Unresolved security issues (#606652), tests fail (#628622, #337249). > # Removal in a month. > net-dns/hesiod > > # Pacho Ramos (18 Mar 2018) > # Depends

[gentoo-dev] Lastrites: net-dns/hesiod, games-arcade/monkey-bubble, app-shells/scsh-install-lib, dev-db/mysql-udf-infusion...

# Pacho Ramos (18 Mar 2018) # Unresolved security issues (#606652), tests fail (#628622, #337249). # Removal in a month. net-dns/hesiod # Pacho Ramos (18 Mar 2018) # Depends on gstreamer:0.10 and many more dead libs (#629174), upstream dead # for ages

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/2] portage.dbapi.vartree: Support exclusions in INSTALL_MASK

Allow INSTALL_MASK patterns to start with '-' to indicate that a specific match is to be excluded from being masked. In this case, the last matching pattern determines whether the file is actually filtered out or kept. --- pym/portage/dbapi/vartree.py | 10 ++ 1 file changed, 6

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] phase-functions: Rework INSTALL_MASK to apply as a merge filter

Rework the INSTALL_MASK handler to filter installed files while merging instead of removing them from the installation image. The INSTALL_MASK handling is now moved to Python side of code, with bash being only used to evaluate the value of INSTALL_MASK (with respect to bashrc). The evaluated

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/3] INSTALL_MASK refurbishing resubmit

On Fri, 2018-03-16 at 09:13 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click > links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the > content is safe. > > > W dniu pią, 16.03.2018 o godzinie 08∶11 +, użytkownik

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/3] INSTALL_MASK refurbishing resubmit

W dniu czw, 15.03.2018 o godzinie 22∶10 -0700, użytkownik Zac Medico napisał: > A binary package should > use the value of INSTALL_MASK that existed at build time. > Wait a minute! This doesn't make any sense. The whole point of having separate PKG_INSTALL_MASK and INSTALL_MASK is to be able to