On 10/20/2018 04:21 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> It seems that random values in GOBIN can affect the building of some packages:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/631776
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/636506
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/638572
>
> I would then append it to ENV_UNSET in make.defaults to get that
On 10/20/2018 04:05 AM, Mikle Kolyada wrote:
>
> ...
>
Ok, thanks for clarifying. I wanted to be sure that I wasn't getting
anyone into trouble by suggesting that they look into the quizzes (if
they are really willing to put in the effort).
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 8:19 AM Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
>
> On Freitag, 12. Oktober 2018 14:50:55 CEST Rich Freeman wrote:
> > ARM is not a Gentoo security supported arch.
> >
> > If the ARM maintainers feel that stable keywords make the lives of
> > their users better, and it isn't causing
On 20.10.2018 15:26, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
> On Samstag, 20. Oktober 2018 14:22:04 CEST Mikle Kolyada wrote:
>> No, keywords status is irrelevant, it is for the security team meaning
>> that they can
>> release a glsa w/o waiting for the stabilization of the security
>> unsupported arches
On Samstag, 20. Oktober 2018 14:22:04 CEST Mikle Kolyada wrote:
> No, keywords status is irrelevant, it is for the security team meaning
> that they can
> release a glsa w/o waiting for the stabilization of the security
> unsupported arches
In my experience glsa only happens after cleanup, and
On 20.10.2018 15:19, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
> On Freitag, 12. Oktober 2018 14:50:55 CEST Rich Freeman wrote:
>> ARM is not a Gentoo security supported arch.
>>
>> If the ARM maintainers feel that stable keywords make the lives of
>> their users better, and it isn't causing problems for
On Freitag, 12. Oktober 2018 14:50:55 CEST Rich Freeman wrote:
> ARM is not a Gentoo security supported arch.
>
> If the ARM maintainers feel that stable keywords make the lives of
> their users better, and it isn't causing problems for anybody else,
> I'm not sure why we should be interfering
It seems that random values in GOBIN can affect the building of some packages:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/631776
https://bugs.gentoo.org/636506
https://bugs.gentoo.org/638572
I would then append it to ENV_UNSET in make.defaults to get that variable unset
without needing to do the same for every
On Sat, 20 Oct 2018 12:41:03 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> We seem to have a lot of global flags that are used only by a few
> packages. How about moving them to local flags? List of flags with
> less than 5 packages using them, ordered by use count, follows. Where
> applicable, local flag
Hi,
We seem to have a lot of global flags that are used only by a few
packages. How about moving them to local flags? List of flags with
less than 5 packages using them, ordered by use count, follows. Where
applicable, local flag descriptions are listed.
bcmath (1 uses):
dev-lang/php:
On 20.10.2018 03:33, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 10/13/2018 02:32 PM, Mikle Kolyada wrote:
>> Quizzes are irrelevant, a person does the quizzes when he/she is
>> ready to be the dev, doing quizzes for quizzes or quizzes to become a
>> developer is the best way to get rejected by the recruiters
11 matches
Mail list logo
