Michał Górny schrieb:
Packages must not disable installing manpages via USE flags
a. USE flags that disable building both a program and its manpage
I think it seems an implicit goal that this policy should apply to programs
and their manpages?
In that case, I would suggest to at least
On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 15:25:10 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> What are your comments?
I think there's a situation not covered by this prose which is in a bit
of a grey area as per the intentions behind it, (but I would argue is
otherwise fine).
Some systems ship multiple types of documentation, and
On 2019-07-17 16:56, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> I'm against this.
>
> I seriously doubt maintainers will take the time/effort to pre-build
> and distribute manpages. The end result of this will be additional
> hard dependencies on heavyweight packages.
I second that.
Keep in mind that aside new time
I am also against the part of the proposal about maintainer being
responsible to prebuild the docs.
I'd also like to note that Gentoo users are empowered to locally bump
ebuild versions in this insanely easy way, it almost always works, and
it is really useful at times.
With this policy, this
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 09:09:47PM +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> Ühel kenal päeval, K, 17.07.2019 kell 18:05, kirjutas Robin H. Johnson:
> > - significantly increases the version bump requirements (can't simply
> > copy & local-build & quick-test & commit)
> Unrelated to the topic at hand, but I
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 6:25 AM Michał Górny wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The QA team would like to introduce the following policy:
>
> """
> Packages must not disable installing manpages via USE flags (e.g.
> USE=man or USE=doc).
Xorg libraries use USE=doc to control the build (sometimes) and
Ühel kenal päeval, K, 17.07.2019 kell 18:05, kirjutas Robin H. Johnson:
> - significantly increases the version bump requirements (can't simply
> copy & local-build & quick-test & commit)
Unrelated to the topic at hand, but I seriously hope this isn't the
standard we aim for in our version
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 03:25:10PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The QA team would like to introduce the following policy:
>
> """
> Packages must not disable installing manpages via USE flags (e.g.
> USE=man or USE=doc). If upstream does not ship prebuilt manpages
> and building them
On 2019.07.17 14:25, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The QA team would like to introduce the following policy:
>
> """
> Packages must not disable installing manpages via USE flags (e.g.
> USE=man or USE=doc). If upstream does not ship prebuilt manpages
> and building them requires additional
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 9:25 AM Michał Górny wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The QA team would like to introduce the following policy:
>
> """
> Packages must not disable installing manpages via USE flags (e.g.
> USE=man or USE=doc). If upstream does not ship prebuilt manpages
> and building them requires
On Wed, 2019-07-17 at 15:42 +0200, Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier wrote:
> [2019-07-17 15:25:10+0200] Michał Górny:
> > The QA team would like to introduce the following policy:
> >
> > """
> > Packages must not disable installing manpages via USE flags (e.g.
> > USE=man or USE=doc). If upstream
[2019-07-17 15:25:10+0200] Michał Górny:
> The QA team would like to introduce the following policy:
>
> """
> Packages must not disable installing manpages via USE flags (e.g.
> USE=man or USE=doc). If upstream does not ship prebuilt manpages
> and building them requires additional
Hello,
The QA team would like to introduce the following policy:
"""
Packages must not disable installing manpages via USE flags (e.g.
USE=man or USE=doc). If upstream does not ship prebuilt manpages
and building them requires additional dependencies, the maintainer
should build them and ship
# Hans de Graaff (2019-07-17)
# Mask ruby24-only slots for removal in 30 days. These slots do not
# have any reverse dependencies. Please migrate to or use a newer slot.
dev-ruby/gherkin:4
dev-ruby/net-http-persistent:0
dev-ruby/net-ssh-gateway:2
dev-ruby/rouge:0
dev-ruby/vcr:2
dev-ruby/webmock:2
14 matches
Mail list logo
