Re: [gentoo-dev] New distfile mirror layout

2019-10-28 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 2019-10-29 at 00:24 +0100, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > Hi! > > > Today you get chastised for using /space/distfiles-local and not > > following policy changes. The devmanual states that it's deprecated > > since at least 2011, and talks of using d.g.o [1]. > > [1] >

Re: [gentoo-dev] New distfile mirror layout

2019-10-28 Thread Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Hi! Today you get chastised for using /space/distfiles-local and not following policy changes. The devmanual states that it's deprecated since at least 2011, and talks of using d.g.o [1]. > [1] https://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/mirrors/index.html#suitable-download-hosts Sorry

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Create ejabberd project

2019-10-28 Thread Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier
[2019-10-28 11:12:49+0100] Hanno Böck: > There are a bunch of dev-erlang/* packages whose primary reason for > packagin is that they're dependencies of ejabberd (and they're becoming > more), most of them currently in maintainer-needed status. > > I'd like to group those together as maintained by

[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: OpenVAS Stuff

2019-10-28 Thread Hasan Calisir
Hasan ÇALIŞIR (2019-10-27) # OpenVAS project name has been renamed in # Greenbone Vulnerability Management (GVM). # Also OpenVAS component names has been renamed. # New loader package is net-analyzer/gvm. # Old OpenVAS stuff Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #692004 net-analyzer/openvas

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] install-qa-check.d: remove check that bans libtool files and static libs from /

2019-10-28 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 1:58 PM Michał Górny wrote: > And why are you trying to sneak it past most of the developers via > gentoo-portage-dev instead of gentoo-dev? Sending mail to this list is standard-procedure when submitting a patch against the Portage repo. If you feel it needs wider

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/3] virtual/cargo: drop virtual

2019-10-28 Thread William Hubbs
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:18:17AM +1300, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Sun, 27 Oct 2019 12:05:02 -0500 > William Hubbs wrote: > > > If a build dep of something changes, the correct response with > > --with-bdeps=y is to rebuild everything that depends on the changed dep. > > Unfortunately, my

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: Gimp and related (gegl, babl, mypaint)

2019-10-28 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Hello, I need to admit that I don't have enough time to keep up with maintaining the Gimp-related packages well enough in Gentoo. Latest ebuild of Babl and Gegl ebuilds are using Meson by now, Gimp is up next and 2.10.14 is just out the door. These packages are up for grabs now:

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] News Item: Desktop profile switching USE default to elogind

2019-10-28 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 28.10.2019 13:36, Brian Evans wrote: > On 10/27/2019 10:19 PM, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: >> Rebuild all affected consumers and remove sys-auth/consolekit: >> >> # emerge --ask --changed-use --deep world missing set operator in line above as well >> # emerge --unmerge consolekit --

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] News Item: Desktop profile switching USE default to elogind

2019-10-28 Thread Brian Evans
On 10/27/2019 10:19 PM, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > Rebuild all affected consumers and remove sys-auth/consolekit: > > # emerge --ask --changed-use --deep world > # emerge --unmerge consolekit > Can we please avoid using --unmerge when it is not necessary? This should be 'emerge --depclean

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News Item: Desktop profile switching USE default to elogind

2019-10-28 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 10:19 PM Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > > Enter the elogind project [2], which is a standalone logind implementation > based on systemd code, currently maintained by a fellow Gentoo user. A few minor comments: 1. While it is somewhat implicit in the headers, you might

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News Item v3: sys-fs/cryfs-0.10.2 update

2019-10-28 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2019, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > News-Item-Format: 1.0 I'm aware that it's not required by policy to use the newest format, but is there any particular reason for not using 2.0? More generally, can we deprecate News-Item-Format 1.0? Ulrich signature.asc Description:

[gentoo-dev] RFC: Create ejabberd project

2019-10-28 Thread Hanno Böck
Hi, I'm currently working on getting ejabberd up to date in Gentoo. There are a bunch of dev-erlang/* packages whose primary reason for packagin is that they're dependencies of ejabberd (and they're becoming more), most of them currently in maintainer-needed status. I'd like to group those