[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH v2] Add @unsatisfied-deps package set (bug 248026)

2021-06-18 Thread Zac Medico
On 6/18/21 8:13 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 6/18/21 6:01 PM, Zac Medico wrote: >> If emerge --depclean fails to resolve any dependencies, then it will >> now suggest emerge @unsatisfied-deps as the simplest possible >> solution, and will also suggest to unmerge @unavailable where >> appropriate at

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH v2] Add @unsatisfied-deps package set (bug 248026)

2021-06-18 Thread Zac Medico
On 6/18/21 6:01 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > If emerge --depclean fails to resolve any dependencies, then it will > now suggest emerge @unsatisfied-deps as the simplest possible > solution, and will also suggest to unmerge @unavailable where > appropriate at the end: > > $ emerge --depclean > >

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] Add @unsatisfied-deps package set (bug 248026)

2021-06-18 Thread Zac Medico
If emerge --depclean fails to resolve any dependencies, then it will now suggest emerge @unsatisfied-deps as the simplest possible solution, and will also suggest to unmerge @unavailable where appropriate at the end: $ emerge --depclean Calculating dependencies... done! * Dependencies could not

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] qmail.eclass: simplify is_prime()

2021-06-18 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
Am Freitag, 18. Juni 2021, 21:10:27 CEST schrieb Michael Orlitzky: > > This depends on the actual domain of numbers. If the primes involved > > have 20 digits as in your example, then factor should be used of course. > > > > I suspect though that we're talking about small numbers (below 100?) > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] qmail.eclass: simplify is_prime()

2021-06-18 Thread Michael Orlitzky
> > This depends on the actual domain of numbers. If the primes involved > have 20 digits as in your example, then factor should be used of course. > > I suspect though that we're talking about small numbers (below 100?) > here, in which case a solution in pure bash would be preferable. > If

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] glep-0082: New key "eapis-testing"

2021-06-18 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Fri, 18 Jun 2021, Michał Górny wrote: >> +Post-History: 2021-05-19 2021-06-18 > Sorry for failing to notice it earlier but you've missed a comma between > the dates. Thanks. Updated locally. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] glep-0082: New key "eapis-testing"

2021-06-18 Thread Michał Górny
On Fri, 2021-06-18 at 18:26 +0200, Ulrich Müller wrote: > As discussed in #gentoo-portage yesterday: After a new EAPI has been > approved, there is a period during which there is no stable Portage > version supporting the new EAPI, and ebuilds for the new EAPI should > not be stabilised during

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] qmail.eclass: simplify is_prime()

2021-06-18 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Thu, 17 Jun 2021, Guilherme Amadio wrote: > There's actually a much simpler solution to this: > $ is_prime() { test $(factor $1 | cut -d: -f2 | wc -w) == 1; } > $ for n in $(seq 0 10); do is_prime $n && echo $n is prime; done > 2 is prime > 3 is prime > 5 is prime > 7 is prime > $ time

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-apps/rescan-scsi-bus

2021-06-18 Thread Mike Gilbert
# Mike Gilbert (2021-06-17) # rescan-scsi-bus.sh is installed by >=sys-apps/sg3_utils-1.44, rendering # this package redundant. # Removal on 2021-07-17. sys-apps/rescan-scsi-bus

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] glep-0082: New key "eapis-testing"

2021-06-18 Thread Ulrich Müller
As discussed in #gentoo-portage yesterday: After a new EAPI has been approved, there is a period during which there is no stable Portage version supporting the new EAPI, and ebuilds for the new EAPI should not be stabilised during that period. Add a new "eapis-testing" key to layout.conf, so that