Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New Developer: Florian Schmaus (flow)

2021-06-22 Thread A Schenck
On 6/22/21 12:45 PM, Wolfgang E. Sanyer wrote: > Welcome flo! > > I think toralf made thin on-topic now: I quite enjoy Andechser > Doppelbock Dunkel, which I believe is brewed in Germany :) > We're lucky enough to occasionally get that even out here in San Francisco, I seek it out whenever it's

[gentoo-portage-dev] In what phase are file "merged"?

2021-06-22 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
In PMS 9.2 is says: The call order for upgrading, downgrading or reinstalling a package is: pkg_pretend (only for EAPIs listed in table 9.2), which is called outside of the normal call order process. pkg_setup src_unpack src_prepare (only for EAPIs listed in table 9.3)

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/2] usr-ldscript.eclass: Remove duplicate prefix check

2021-06-22 Thread Ulrich Müller
This code won't be reached with USE=prefix. Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller --- eclass/usr-ldscript.eclass | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/eclass/usr-ldscript.eclass b/eclass/usr-ldscript.eclass index e35347b6f8cb..6a38fed3347a 100644 --- a/eclass/usr-ldscript.eclass +++

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] usr-ldscript.eclass: Support EAPI 8, drop support for EAPI 4

2021-06-22 Thread Ulrich Müller
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller --- eclass/usr-ldscript.eclass | 8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/usr-ldscript.eclass b/eclass/usr-ldscript.eclass index 4ee129bda836..e35347b6f8cb 100644 --- a/eclass/usr-ldscript.eclass +++

Re: [gentoo-dev] 'pax_kernel' USE flag

2021-06-22 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
FYI: The PaX community in Gentoo is still big and active. Many Gentoo users received free access to upstream sources or became paying customers. It's just not available for everyone for free/without registration anymore. But it is still a thing in Gentoo. So I wonder, how is the status

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: Florian Schmaus (flow)

2021-06-22 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Welcome Florian!!! Where in Franconia are you from?! Regensburg here, so just "south beyond the border"... :D (Arcobräu!) Am Dienstag, 22. Juni 2021, 21:27:11 CEST schrieb Gokturk Yuksek: > Hello everyone, > > I'd like to announce with great pleasure our latest addition to the > developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New Developer: Florian Schmaus (flow)

2021-06-22 Thread Marco Scardovi
As said on it, welcome to the dark side! Il Mar 22 Giu 2021, 21:45 Wolfgang E. Sanyer ha scritto: > Welcome flo! > > I think toralf made thin on-topic now: I quite enjoy Andechser Doppelbock > Dunkel, which I believe is brewed in Germany :) > > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 3:34 PM Toralf Förster

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New Developer: Florian Schmaus (flow)

2021-06-22 Thread Wolfgang E. Sanyer
Welcome flo! I think toralf made thin on-topic now: I quite enjoy Andechser Doppelbock Dunkel, which I believe is brewed in Germany :) On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 3:34 PM Toralf Förster wrote: > On 6/22/21 9:27 PM, Gokturk Yuksek wrote: > > he enjoys running and the cold beverages of his home

[gentoo-dev] Re: New Developer: Florian Schmaus (flow)

2021-06-22 Thread Toralf Förster
On 6/22/21 9:27 PM, Gokturk Yuksek wrote: he enjoys running and the cold beverages of his home region, Franconia. Please give him a warm welcome! Welcome flo ! OT but worth to mention I prefer a "Störtebecker" (brewewd in Stralsund). -- Toralf PGP 23217DA7 9B888F45 OpenPGP_signature

[gentoo-dev] New Developer: Florian Schmaus (flow)

2021-06-22 Thread Gokturk Yuksek
Hello everyone, I'd like to announce with great pleasure our latest addition to the developer community. Florian Schmaus is joining us from Germany. He is a computer scientist focusing on operating systems and runtime systems for future many-core systems. His FOSS contributions include

Re: [gentoo-dev] 'pax_kernel' USE flag

2021-06-22 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 10:35:12 +0100 Marek Szuba wrote: > Dear everyone, > > Seeing as in the end this USE flag is not going anywhere in spite of > Gentoo no longer providing PaX-capable kernel sources, could we please > rename it (e.g. to 'pax-kernel') so that it no longer contains a >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/4] acct-group.eclass: EAPI 8 support

2021-06-22 Thread David Michael
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 1:15 PM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Jun 2021, David Michael wrote: > > -# Then you add appropriate dependency to your package. The dependency > > -# type(s) should be: > > -# - DEPEND (+ RDEPEND) if the group is already needed at build time, > > -# - RDEPEND

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/4] acct-group.eclass: EAPI 8 support

2021-06-22 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Tue, 22 Jun 2021, David Michael wrote: > -# Then you add appropriate dependency to your package. The dependency > -# type(s) should be: > -# - DEPEND (+ RDEPEND) if the group is already needed at build time, > -# - RDEPEND if it is needed at install time (e.g. you 'fowners' files > -#

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/4] user.eclass: EAPI 8 support

2021-06-22 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Tue, 22 Jun 2021, David Michael wrote: > --- a/eclass/user.eclass > +++ b/eclass/user.eclass > @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ > # @MAINTAINER: > # base-sys...@gentoo.org (Linux) > # Michał Górny (NetBSD) > -# @SUPPORTED_EAPIS: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > +# @SUPPORTED_EAPIS: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EAPIs 0 to 4

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 4/4] acct-user.eclass: EAPI 8 support

2021-06-22 Thread David Michael
Update the documentation to describe how to depend on GLEP 81 packages with EAPI 8. There is no NSS module for resolving the accounts installed in $SYSROOT, so acct-* packages might also need need to be in $BROOT e.g. for fowners which directly calls chmod. - BDEPEND so the build system can

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/4] acct-group.eclass: EAPI 8 support

2021-06-22 Thread David Michael
Update the documentation to describe how to depend on GLEP 81 packages with EAPI 8. There is no NSS module for resolving the accounts installed in $SYSROOT, so acct-* packages might also need need to be in $BROOT e.g. for fowners which directly calls chmod. - BDEPEND so the build system can

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/4] user.eclass: EAPI 8 support

2021-06-22 Thread David Michael
Signed-off-by: David Michael --- eclass/user.eclass | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/eclass/user.eclass b/eclass/user.eclass index e1f87a383ad..a1fb2a9bbaf 100644 --- a/eclass/user.eclass +++ b/eclass/user.eclass @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ # @MAINTAINER: #

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/4] user-info.eclass: EAPI 8 support

2021-06-22 Thread David Michael
Signed-off-by: David Michael --- eclass/user-info.eclass | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/user-info.eclass b/eclass/user-info.eclass index d349fc17476..8b8538bf843 100644 --- a/eclass/user-info.eclass +++ b/eclass/user-info.eclass @@ -5,11 +5,11 @@

Re: [gentoo-dev] 'pax_kernel' USE flag

2021-06-22 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 12:06 PM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > On Tue, 22 Jun 2021, Marek Szuba wrote: > > > Seeing as in the end this USE flag is not going anywhere in spite of > > Gentoo no longer providing PaX-capable kernel sources, could we please > > rename it (e.g. to 'pax-kernel') so

Re: [gentoo-dev] 'pax_kernel' USE flag

2021-06-22 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Tue, 22 Jun 2021, Marek Szuba wrote: > Seeing as in the end this USE flag is not going anywhere in spite of > Gentoo no longer providing PaX-capable kernel sources, could we please > rename it (e.g. to 'pax-kernel') so that it no longer contains a > disallowed character. I understand

Re: [gentoo-dev] 'pax_kernel' USE flag

2021-06-22 Thread David Seifert
On Tue, 2021-06-22 at 10:35 +0100, Marek Szuba wrote: > Dear everyone, > > Seeing as in the end this USE flag is not going anywhere in spite of > rename it (e.g. to 'pax-kernel') so that it no longer contains a > disallowed character. I understand the main reason this hasn't been > done > yet

[gentoo-dev] 'pax_kernel' USE flag

2021-06-22 Thread Marek Szuba
Dear everyone, Seeing as in the end this USE flag is not going anywhere in spite of Gentoo no longer providing PaX-capable kernel sources, could we please rename it (e.g. to 'pax-kernel') so that it no longer contains a disallowed character. I understand the main reason this hasn't been done

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please review changes for vdr-plugin-2.eclass

2021-06-22 Thread Martin Dummer
Am 17.05.21 um 18:11 schrieb Martin Dummer: > So please take a view on the intended changes to  vdr-plugin-2.eclass - > add documentation to satisfy pkgcheck. > > It is placed here: > > https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/20845 > Due to very little feedback I post here the intended changes to