[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: gnome-extra/gnome-documents

2022-05-23 Thread Matt Turner
# Matt Turner (2022-05-23) # Dead package upstream. Depends on dead app-misc/tracker:0. # Removal on 2022-06-23. Bug #846605 gnome-extra/gnome-documents signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: pkgdev new release v0.2.1 with breaking change

2022-05-23 Thread Arthur Zamarin
On 23/05/2022 20.57, Andrew Ammerlaan wrote: > On 22/05/2022 20:20, Arthur Zamarin wrote: >> I have just released a new version [0] for pkgdev. Outside of multiple >> new features meant for easier developer workflows (like prepare to send >> a last-rite email), there is an important changes in the

[gentoo-dev] Re: pkgdev new release v0.2.1 with breaking change

2022-05-23 Thread Andrew Ammerlaan
On 22/05/2022 20:20, Arthur Zamarin wrote: I have just released a new version [0] for pkgdev. Outside of multiple new features meant for easier developer workflows (like prepare to send a last-rite email), there is an important changes in the release which affect current users of pkgdev. **

Re: [gentoo-dev] packages touching files in /dev

2022-05-23 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 5:39 AM wrote: > > Dear package maintainers, > please do not mess with preexisting files in /dev. > > I have static /dev and that suit me well for quite a few systems that > has a static environment, especially system that are intended to run > for a long time and where I

[gentoo-dev] packages touching files in /dev

2022-05-23 Thread karl
Dear package maintainers, please do not mess with preexisting files in /dev. I have static /dev and that suit me well for quite a few systems that has a static environment, especially system that are intended to run for a long time and where I tend to minimize the number of running processes,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upstream remote-id types in package metadata

2022-05-23 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sun, 22 May 2022, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > Some of them seem to be obsolete. Presumably freshmeat, gitorious, and > google-code should be removed? Any other removal candidates? > Looks like SourceForge-JP was renamed to OSDN, should the file reflect > that? > Also, the "gentoo"