Re: [gentoo-dev] Disturbing state of arch testing in Gentoo

2022-11-06 Thread Joonas Niilola
On 7.11.2022 8.07, Oskari Pirhonen wrote: > On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 11:37:24 +0100, Piotr Karbowski wrote: >> I would be in favour of stepping up the social contract and actually >> prohibiting this kind of things, we had that before too, the nattka you >> mgorny wrote is replacement for old

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disturbing state of arch testing in Gentoo

2022-11-06 Thread Oskari Pirhonen
On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 11:37:24 +0100, Piotr Karbowski wrote: > I would be in favour of stepping up the social contract and actually > prohibiting this kind of things, we had that before too, the nattka you > mgorny wrote is replacement for old bugzilla bot that was ... > closedsource and

[gentoo-dev] Looking for dedicated ModemManager maintainer

2022-11-06 Thread Matt Turner
The following packages are currently maintained by GNOME for no real reason other than they're a dependency of networkmanager: net-misc/modemmanager net-libs/libmbim net-libs/libqmi net-libs/libqrtr-glib But I don't have any ability to test them. I'd really appreciate a dedicated maintainer take

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disturbing state of arch testing in Gentoo

2022-11-06 Thread John Helmert III
On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 08:03:16PM +0100, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > On domenica 6 novembre 2022 14:27:40 CET John Helmert III wrote: > > As far as I can tell, there's ONE person relying completely on a > > proprietary arch testing system. > > > > Ago, could you comment on this? What's blocking

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] git-r3.eclass: Add checkout dirs as "safe" directories

2022-11-06 Thread Florian Schmaus
On 06.11.22 16:52, Michał Górny wrote: On Sun, 2022-11-06 at 16:08 +0100, Florian Schmaus wrote: Fair point, and I suspected as much. Am I right that this does modify ~portage/.gitconfig (so usually /var/lib/portage/home/.gitconfig)? If so, I wonder if this could be avoided, e.g., by setting

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disturbing state of arch testing in Gentoo

2022-11-06 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On domenica 6 novembre 2022 14:27:40 CET John Helmert III wrote: > As far as I can tell, there's ONE person relying completely on a > proprietary arch testing system. > > Ago, could you comment on this? What's blocking you from open sourcing > your software? Hi, I already answered in the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disturbing state of arch testing in Gentoo

2022-11-06 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On domenica 6 novembre 2022 09:15:40 CET Michał Górny wrote: > On top of that, it seems that most of it still relies on proprietary > software and we have no clue how *exactly* it works, and it's really, > really hard to get a straight answer. I'm speaking for myself. I still use getatoms.py to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The Gentoo VDR Project is empty

2022-11-06 Thread Jonas Stein
Hi Martin, as I already have taken care about many packages from the vdr project, I will continue to do so. Thank you very much for your offer. This is great. Is there any progress on the discussion about [gentoo-project] RFC: "Trusted contributor model"? I think it makes no sense to have

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] git-r3.eclass: Add checkout dirs as "safe" directories

2022-11-06 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 2022-11-06 at 16:08 +0100, Florian Schmaus wrote: > On 06.11.22 12:38, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Sun, 2022-11-06 at 12:19 +0100, Florian Schmaus wrote: > > > On 06.11.22 12:03, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > Mark all checkout directories as "safe" to avoid dubious ownership > > > > errors

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] git-r3.eclass: Add checkout dirs as "safe" directories

2022-11-06 Thread Florian Schmaus
On 06.11.22 12:38, Michał Górny wrote: On Sun, 2022-11-06 at 12:19 +0100, Florian Schmaus wrote: On 06.11.22 12:03, Michał Górny wrote: Mark all checkout directories as "safe" to avoid dubious ownership errors with newer git versions when the checkout directory is accessed from src_install().

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disturbing state of arch testing in Gentoo

2022-11-06 Thread John Helmert III
On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 09:15:40AM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > Arch testing's relying on automation a lot these days. Not saying > that's bad, if it improves the state of affairs. However, I have some > concerns, based on what I've seen lately. > > On top of that, it seems

[gentoo-dev] Re: The Gentoo VDR Project is empty

2022-11-06 Thread Joonas Niilola
On 6.11.2022 11.49, Martin Dummer wrote: > Hi, > > as I already have taken care about many packages from the vdr project, I > will continue to do so. > > Is there any progress on the discussion about [gentoo-project] RFC: > "Trusted contributor model"? > > Meanwhile I continue to wait for an

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] git-r3.eclass: Add checkout dirs as "safe" directories

2022-11-06 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On Sun, 2022-11-06 at 12:19 +0100, Florian Schmaus wrote: > > I guess there is no way we can avoid the --global and use --local instead? > The setting is only respected if it's in the global ($HOME) or system (/etc) configs. There's no explanation for that in the man page, but it's probably

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] git-r3.eclass: Add checkout dirs as "safe" directories

2022-11-06 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 2022-11-06 at 12:19 +0100, Florian Schmaus wrote: > On 06.11.22 12:03, Michał Górny wrote: > > Mark all checkout directories as "safe" to avoid dubious ownership > > errors with newer git versions when the checkout directory is accessed > > from src_install(). > > > > Bug:

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] git-r3.eclass: Add checkout dirs as "safe" directories

2022-11-06 Thread Florian Schmaus
On 06.11.22 12:03, Michał Górny wrote: Mark all checkout directories as "safe" to avoid dubious ownership errors with newer git versions when the checkout directory is accessed from src_install(). Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/879353 Signed-off-by: Michał Górny --- eclass/git-r3.eclass | 5

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] git-r3.eclass: Add checkout dirs as "safe" directories

2022-11-06 Thread Michał Górny
Mark all checkout directories as "safe" to avoid dubious ownership errors with newer git versions when the checkout directory is accessed from src_install(). Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/879353 Signed-off-by: Michał Górny --- eclass/git-r3.eclass | 5 + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disturbing state of arch testing in Gentoo

2022-11-06 Thread Piotr Karbowski
Hi, On 06/11/2022 09.15, Michał Górny wrote: On top of that, it seems that most of it still relies on proprietary software and we have no clue how*exactly* it works, and it's really, really hard to get a straight answer. I never understood how it become socially acceptable in open source

[gentoo-dev] Re: The Gentoo VDR Project is empty

2022-11-06 Thread Martin Dummer
Hi, as I already have taken care about many packages from the vdr project, I will continue to do so. Is there any progress on the discussion about [gentoo-project] RFC: "Trusted contributor model"? Meanwhile I continue to wait for an answer on my email to recruit...@gentoo.org from november

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disturbing state of arch testing in Gentoo

2022-11-06 Thread Sam James
> On 6 Nov 2022, at 08:15, Michał Górny wrote: > > Hi, everyone. > > Arch testing's relying on automation a lot these days. Not saying > that's bad, if it improves the state of affairs. However, I have some > concerns, based on what I've seen lately. Thanks for starting this discussion, I

[gentoo-dev] Disturbing state of arch testing in Gentoo

2022-11-06 Thread Michał Górny
Hi, everyone. Arch testing's relying on automation a lot these days. Not saying that's bad, if it improves the state of affairs. However, I have some concerns, based on what I've seen lately. On top of that, it seems that most of it still relies on proprietary software and we have no clue how

Re: [gentoo-dev] Status of Python 3.8

2022-11-06 Thread Anna V
On 2022-11-06 07:09, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > I think it's time to ask once again: how much do you need Python 3.8 > target to remain available in Gentoo? > > Right now we support four CPython targets: 3.8 through 3.11. 3.10 is > the current default, we're going to move 3.11 from

[gentoo-dev] The Gentoo VDR Project is empty

2022-11-06 Thread Joonas Niilola
Hey all, with the only member of VDR project gone, the project is currently essentially empty. https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:VDR Please join the project to keep it alive. We may have some help through the proxy-maint project, but someone with immediate commit access is always better. If

[gentoo-dev] Status of Python 3.8

2022-11-06 Thread Michał Górny
Hi, everyone. I think it's time to ask once again: how much do you need Python 3.8 target to remain available in Gentoo? Right now we support four CPython targets: 3.8 through 3.11. 3.10 is the current default, we're going to move 3.11 from ~arch to stable soon. We've also added the first alpha