On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 11:21 AM Matt Turner wrote:
>
> ninja operates in one of three modes:
> - verbose (with -v): prints build commands
> - quiet (with --quiet): prints nothing
> - normal: prints [XX/YY]-style build status updates
>
> samurai works the same way, except it does not have a
From: Jonas Rakebrandt
This works similar to cmake.eclass's ${CMAKE_VERBOSE}.
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/28942
Signed-off-by: Jonas Rakebrandt
Signed-off-by: Matt Turner
---
eclass/meson.eclass | 15 +--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff
Sam James writes:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
>
> Florian Schmaus writes:
>
>> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
>> On 18/07/2023 11.56, Sam James wrote:
>>> Mike Gilbert writes:
>>>
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 4:27 PM Sam James wrote:
>> Haven't we been keeping these because we still
Florian Schmaus writes:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> On 18/07/2023 11.56, Sam James wrote:
>> Mike Gilbert writes:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 4:27 PM Sam James wrote:
> Haven't we been keeping these because we still need to decide on a
> policy about what to do with dead
On 18/07/2023 11.56, Sam James wrote:
Mike Gilbert writes:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 4:27 PM Sam James wrote:
Haven't we been keeping these because we still need to decide on a
policy about what to do with dead acct-*/* packages?
Right. https://bugs.gentoo.org/781881 is still open. Flow
Mike Gilbert writes:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 4:27 PM Sam James wrote:
>> > Haven't we been keeping these because we still need to decide on a
>> > policy about what to do with dead acct-*/* packages?
>>
>> Right. https://bugs.gentoo.org/781881 is still open. Flow could ping
>> the QA team
# Hans de Graaff (2023-07-18)
# Obsolete rubu30-only package, previously a dependency of nanoc. No
# longer maintained upstream. Masked for removal on 2023-08-18.
dev-ruby/hamster
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 18-07-2023 11:42:39 +0300, Зураб Квачадзе wrote:
> How do we handle this case, then.
> Imagine we have a leaf package acct-user/foo, which has a reserved UID of 123.
> It gets last rited and its entry is removed from uid-gid.txt. After a while
> appears a new package acct-user/bar, which takes
Well, this configuration is reasonable, I am for the change
On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 at 11:55 Florian Schmaus wrote:
> On 18/07/2023 10.42, Зураб Квачадзе wrote:
> > How do we handle this case, then.
> > Imagine we have a leaf package acct-user/foo, which has a reserved UID
> > of 123. It gets last
On 18/07/2023 10.42, Зураб Квачадзе wrote:
How do we handle this case, then.
Imagine we have a leaf package acct-user/foo, which has a reserved UID
of 123. It gets last rited and its entry is removed from uid-gid.txt.
Nobody is proposing that the uid-gid.txt entry is removed. Ideally, it
How do we handle this case, then.
Imagine we have a leaf package acct-user/foo, which has a reserved UID of
123. It gets last rited and its entry is removed from uid-gid.txt. After a
while appears a new package acct-user/bar, which takes the 123 UID. Then a
user, say Bob, updates their system,
El jue, 01-01-1970 a las 00:00 +, Ulrich Mueller escribió:
> > > > > > On Mon, 17 Jul 2023, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 4:27 PM Sam James wrote:
> > > > Haven't we been keeping these because we still need to decide
> > > > on a
> > > > policy about what to do with dead
v2 is mostly just some style fixes and simplifications. The only major
difference is that secureboot_auto_sign now also finds .efi32, .efi64 in
addition to .efi files. Furthermore, the find is now case insensitive.
Best regards,
Andrew
From 5fa9c00477917b07cbecd1619506d6db8e978cfd Mon Sep 17
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2023, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 4:27 PM Sam James wrote:
>> > Haven't we been keeping these because we still need to decide on a
>> > policy about what to do with dead acct-*/* packages?
>>
>> Right. https://bugs.gentoo.org/781881 is still open. Flow
14 matches
Mail list logo
