Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: sys-fs/eudev

2023-09-15 Thread Arsen Arsenović
orbea writes: > I just want to reiterate that the overlay suggestion is bad and the > LibreSSL overlay is a good example of why. No it's not. It is not possible to compare a virtual provider against something hard coded into many packages. > The result is most of the work is redoing things

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: sys-fs/eudev

2023-09-15 Thread Arsen Arsenović
orbea writes: >> Arsen meant incompatibilities of systemd-udev, not of eudev [1]. No >> idea what's the current state of udev upstream is though. Alpine uses >> musl, that's one of reasons why they are interested in eudev. Indeed. > Oh, thanks for clarifying my misunderstanding. After

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: sys-fs/eudev

2023-09-15 Thread orbea
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 01:19:22 +0200 Arsen Arsenović wrote: > "Eddie Chapman" writes: > > > Not aiming this at you personally but this argument has been made > > more than once in this thread and I personally don't think it > > carries any weight, because it can be levelled at anyone who raises

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: sys-fs/eudev

2023-09-15 Thread orbea
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 19:38:27 +0100 Alexey Sokolov wrote: > 15.09.2023 16:10, orbea пишет: > > On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 01:19:22 +0200 > > Arsen Arsenović wrote: > > > >> "Eddie Chapman" writes: > >> > >>> Not aiming this at you personally but this argument has been made > >>> more than once in

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: sys-fs/eudev

2023-09-15 Thread Alexey Sokolov
15.09.2023 16:10, orbea пишет: On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 01:19:22 +0200 Arsen Arsenović wrote: "Eddie Chapman" writes: Not aiming this at you personally but this argument has been made more than once in this thread and I personally don't think it carries any weight, because it can be levelled at

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: sys-fs/eudev

2023-09-15 Thread orbea
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 01:19:22 +0200 Arsen Arsenović wrote: > "Eddie Chapman" writes: > > > Not aiming this at you personally but this argument has been made > > more than once in this thread and I personally don't think it > > carries any weight, because it can be levelled at anyone who raises

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml upstream docs as reference to scientific publications/papers

2023-09-15 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2023, Alexander Neuwirth wrote: > I am looking for a way to link scientific publications to > ebuilds/packages. The easiest, but hacky way right now is to use the > |https://doi.org/...|. Integration with > |epkginfo|/|equery meta| works nicely out of the box. However, >

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-ruby/ruby-elf

2023-09-15 Thread Hans de Graaff
# Hans de Graaff (2023-09-15) # Not compatible with ruby31, no reverse dependencies. Last release in # 2013. Masked for removal on 2023-10-15. dev-ruby/ruby-elf signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] metadata.xml upstream docs as reference to scientific publications/papers

2023-09-15 Thread Alexander Neuwirth
Dear Larry, I am looking for a way to link scientific publications to ebuilds/packages. The easiest, but hacky way right now is to use the |https://doi.org/...|. Integration with |epkginfo|/|equery meta| works nicely out of the box. However, currently |pkgcheck| and/or the XML format