On Tue, 2024-02-20 at 01:14 -0500, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> The meson-python build backend -- as the name suggests -- uses meson
> under the hood. We have a meson eclass which does lots of useful things
> pertinent to meson. Make sure it gets invoked, by prying out the options
> that
On 2/20/24 1:14 AM, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> +# Calculate the command line which meson should use, and other relevant
> +# variables. Invoke via "${mesonargs[@]}" in the calling environment.
> +# This function is called from meson_src_configure.
I'm sure someone probably has a better name than
Eli Schwartz writes:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> On 2/20/24 1:24 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> I'm afraid I get different results. Build log attached. Happy to help
>> figure this out tomorrow.
>>
>> To test, I applied this patch and ran this:
>>
>> ABI_X86="32 x32 64" CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe
On 2/20/24 1:33 AM, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> On 2/20/24 1:24 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> I'm afraid I get different results. Build log attached. Happy to help
>> figure this out tomorrow.
>>
>> To test, I applied this patch and ran this:
>>
>> ABI_X86="32 x32 64" CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe -march=amdfam10
On Mon, 2024-02-19 at 23:26 -0500, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> Use of python_configure_all is a bit broken, because distutils-r1 is a
> bit broken. It has the intriguing value-claim that *FLAGS shall be
> modified with local -x as part of run-phase, which means that all
> modifications are reset as soon
Use of python_configure_all is a bit broken, because distutils-r1 is a
bit broken. It has the intriguing value-claim that *FLAGS shall be
modified with local -x as part of run-phase, which means that all
modifications are reset as soon as any given phase exits. Including
sub-phases. If you make
The meson-python build backend -- as the name suggests -- uses meson
under the hood. We have a meson eclass which does lots of useful things
pertinent to meson. Make sure it gets invoked, by prying out the options
that meson_src_configure would use and setting passing them as our seed
values for
This is necessary in order to get at the implementation of `meson setup`
from other eclasses, which do not simply call meson_src_configure. The
intended use case is distutils-r1, where a python build backend wraps
meson and needs its arguments while calling meson on its own.
This allows
Because that is the logic which meson-python hardcodes, and meson needs
to match calling convention.
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz
---
v2: new patch
eclass/meson.eclass | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/eclass/meson.eclass b/eclass/meson.eclass
index
meson's builtin LTO support allows meson to introspect whether LTO is
enabled and do some fancy things, such as forcing LTO off for a single
target that is known to be special(ly bad) and not support LTO.
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz
---
no change
eclass/meson.eclass | 36
v2 answers the question: how to deal with accumulated mesonargs without
actually *running* meson_src_configure before gpep517
Eli Schwartz (5):
meson.eclass: wire up LTO support directly into the meson options
meson.eclass: prefer -D buildtype instead of --buildtype
meson.eclass: refactor
On 2/20/24 1:24 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> I'm afraid I get different results. Build log attached. Happy to help
> figure this out tomorrow.
>
> To test, I applied this patch and ran this:
>
> ABI_X86="32 x32 64" CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe -march=amdfam10 -flto=2" ebuild
> zstd-1.5.5-r1.ebuild clean
On Mon, 2024-02-19 at 23:26 -0500, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> The meson-python build backend -- as the name suggests -- uses meson
> under the hood. We have a meson eclass which does lots of useful things
> pertinent to meson. Make sure it gets invoked.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz
> ---
>
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 1:09 AM Eli Schwartz wrote:
>
> On 2/20/24 12:58 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 11:26 PM Eli Schwartz wrote:
> >>
> >> meson's builtin LTO support allows meson to introspect whether LTO is
> >> enabled and do some fancy things, such as forcing LTO off
On Mon, 2024-02-19 at 22:14 +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 02:08:32PM -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > Allow checking more disk space, for users with many split volumes and
> > ever-larger packages.
> >
> > gentoo-kernel-bin:
> > / >=350MB/version (in /lib/modules)
On 2/20/24 12:58 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 11:26 PM Eli Schwartz wrote:
>>
>> meson's builtin LTO support allows meson to introspect whether LTO is
>> enabled and do some fancy things, such as forcing LTO off for a single
>> target that is known to be special(ly bad) and
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 11:26 PM Eli Schwartz wrote:
>
> meson's builtin LTO support allows meson to introspect whether LTO is
> enabled and do some fancy things, such as forcing LTO off for a single
> target that is known to be special(ly bad) and not support LTO.
Please make sure to test this
On 19 February 2024 23:08:32 CET, "Robin H. Johnson" wrote:
>Allow checking more disk space, for users with many split volumes and
>ever-larger packages.
>
>gentoo-kernel-bin:
>/ >=350MB/version (in /lib/modules)
>/boot >=40MB/version
>
The problem here is that the kernel is not always
On 2/19/24 11:42 PM, Sam James wrote:
>
> Eli Schwartz writes:
>
>> The meson-python build backend -- as the name suggests -- uses meson
>> under the hood. We have a meson eclass which does lots of useful things
>> pertinent to meson. Make sure it gets invoked.
>>
>
> Maybe check a sample (or
Eli Schwartz writes:
> The meson-python build backend -- as the name suggests -- uses meson
> under the hood. We have a meson eclass which does lots of useful things
> pertinent to meson. Make sure it gets invoked.
>
Maybe check a sample (or ideally all) of the meson-python reverse
Eli Schwartz writes:
> Mainly motivated by some upstream work I did with dev-python/scipy,
> which has some ancient code that will never be updated to work with LTO,
> and some nice new code that works great.
>
> The first patch is a nice improvement on its own. The second one makes
> limited
"Robin H. Johnson" writes:
> Allow checking more disk space, for users with many split volumes and
> ever-larger packages.
>
> gentoo-kernel-bin:
> / >=350MB/version (in /lib/modules)
> /boot >=40MB/version
>
> rust-bin:
> /opt >=450MB/version
>
LGTM, but give a bit of time for other
Use of python_configure_all is a bit broken, because distutils-r1 is a
bit broken. It has the intriguing value-claim that *FLAGS shall be
modified with local -x as part of run-phase, which means that all
modifications are reset as soon as any given phase exits. Including
sub-phases. If you make
meson's builtin LTO support allows meson to introspect whether LTO is
enabled and do some fancy things, such as forcing LTO off for a single
target that is known to be special(ly bad) and not support LTO.
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz
---
eclass/meson.eclass | 36
The meson-python build backend -- as the name suggests -- uses meson
under the hood. We have a meson eclass which does lots of useful things
pertinent to meson. Make sure it gets invoked.
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz
---
eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 6 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1
Mainly motivated by some upstream work I did with dev-python/scipy,
which has some ancient code that will never be updated to work with LTO,
and some nice new code that works great.
The first patch is a nice improvement on its own. The second one makes
limited sense without the third one.
Eli
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 02:08:32PM -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Allow checking more disk space, for users with many split volumes and
> ever-larger packages.
>
> gentoo-kernel-bin:
> / >=350MB/version (in /lib/modules)
> /boot >=40MB/version
>
> rust-bin:
> /opt >=450MB/version
Meta:
Is
Allow checking more disk space, for users with many split volumes and
ever-larger packages.
gentoo-kernel-bin:
/ >=350MB/version (in /lib/modules)
/boot >=40MB/version
rust-bin:
/opt >=450MB/version
Signed-off-by: Robin H. Johnson
---
eclass/check-reqs.eclass | 44
28 matches
Mail list logo
