Re: [gentoo-dev] Update on the 23.0 profiles

2024-04-08 Thread Eddie Chapman
Michael Orlitzky wrote: On Sun, 2024-04-07 at 15:07 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: tl;dr can we turn them back off in the profile? In any scenario where they are beneficial, there's a better place to put them. Easily doable with lzma, if there is consensus for it. Slightly more complex

Re: [gentoo-dev] Update on the 23.0 profiles

2024-04-08 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On Sun, 2024-04-07 at 15:07 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > tl;dr can we turn them back off in the profile? In any scenario where > > they are beneficial, there's a better place to put them. > > Easily doable with lzma, if there is consensus for it. > > Slightly more complex for zstd since

[gentoo-dev] netmount and glusterfs (fuse) dependency management

2024-04-08 Thread Jaco Kroon
Hi All, I was hoping for some advise regarding how I could improve the glusterfs package for users (and myself).  At least those using openrc, but I suspect similar may be applicable to systemd, but I have no idea how systemd handles network mounts so perhaps someone could chip in here on

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-java/icedtea-bin, dev-java/gin, dev-java/gwt, dev-java/validation-api

2024-04-08 Thread Volkmar W. Pogatzki
# Volkmar W. Pogatzki (2024-04-08) # Obsolete java-vm, bugs #848804 #830248. # Removal on 2024-05-08 dev-java/icedtea-bin # Volkmar W. Pogatzki (2024-04-08) # Java libraries without consumers. # Removal on 2024-05-08, bugs #853100 #716228. dev-java/gin dev-java/gwt dev-java/validation-api

[gentoo-dev] Re: Update on the 23.0 profiles

2024-04-08 Thread Duncan
Andreas K. Huettel posted on Sun, 07 Apr 2024 15:07:01 +0200 as excerpted: > Am Sonntag, 7. April 2024, 14:51:55 CEST schrieb Michael Orlitzky: [USE="lzma zstd" in 23.0 profiles] >> [R]emarkably bad timing. How it looks: Gentoo's response to the xz >> incident is to have me rebuild my entire