On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wednesday, June 08, 2011 05:27:27 Patrick Lauer wrote:
So you say that you want to follow the rules but accidentally forgot it?
no idea what you're talking about. the new policy has 0 relevance to actions
performed
Hi,
Building 400~ locales is not fun on mips when building stages.
No user has a need for more than some small subset of the total
available locales.
I filed bug [1] to request the ability to select locales in catalyst
spec files, but no responses after six months -- which is totally
typical of
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 06/07/2011 10:53 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday, May 16, 2011 09:41:08 Mark Loeser wrote:
Mike Frysinger (vapier) vap...@gentoo.org said:
vapier 11/05/16 03:30:02
Removed:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 16:47:29 Dane Smith wrote:
To be perfectly blunt, no small part of what caused this current fiasco
was this exact attitude. I don't like the current policy either, it's
far too wide. However, if
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 17:32:03 Matt Turner wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 16:47:29 Dane Smith wrote:
To be perfectly blunt, no small part of what caused
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 06/02/2011 03:04 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
For this problem, I think some kind of per-ebuild ABI_DEPENDENT flag
should be used to recognize which packages ABI dependencies should
apply to. Without thinking about it too hard
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 6:06 AM, justin j...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi,
after testing this, and I have to say it mostly works smooth and fine, I
hit a huge problem.
I wanted to emerge a package which just depends on glibc provided libs
for the oposite ABI my main ABI is. This specific package
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote:
To be clear I support the goal to move our tree to git.
However, I'd like to point out that simply moving to git will leave us
in the same state. Assuming everyone agrees that git is far more useful
than
2011/4/29 Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org:
2011/3/9 Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org:
As for the reasons: its the fdo version + a debian/patches dir with, heh,
some fixes and improvements I'm using...
So, the SDS version is simply the freedesktop version with a few
patches on top? So
2011/5/9 Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org:
maybe your answer is in the readme :)
http://www.splitted-desktop.com/~gbeauchesne/libva/patches/000_README
some of them are needed, some of them are useful, some we could certainly
drop. If the most important patches could go upstream then, again,
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 04/29/2011 09:26 PM, Mark Loeser wrote:
Samuli Suominen (ssuominen) ssuomi...@gentoo.org said:
ssuominen 11/04/29 18:13:31
Removed: transmission-2.12.ebuild
Log:
drop old, broken with
2011/3/9 Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org:
As for the reasons: its the fdo version + a debian/patches dir with, heh,
some fixes and improvements I'm using...
So, the SDS version is simply the freedesktop version with a few
patches on top? So, the freedesktop version is actually... upstream?
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
sources.gentoo.org is for that. ChangeLog is for users, and old is
not useful information to them
So it follows that users don't need to see when ebuilds were removed?
2011/3/31 Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org:
Dne 31.3.2011 06:55, Jeroen Roovers napsal(a):
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 01:42:51 +0100
Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org wrote:
Again the diff is: http://tinyurl.com/62eb88b
Why not attach it? What the hell does that URL lead me to?
Because our
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:24 PM, justin j...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi,
the descriptions of USE flags should explain what the USE is good for.
In my opinion some thing like
Enables foo intergration
or
Enables support for foo
if it isn't totally clear what foo is, sucks!! There are many, many
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm trying to understand the problem better - do you know what causes
those test failures? I don't expect a complete answer because that'd
probably be a half of actually fixing the failures.
They both have huge
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
Dne 22.2.2011 19:20, Mike Frysinger napsal(a):
Last time (many moons ago) I've checked cairo did not generated
pdf it did generated raster images and wrapped them in a thin pdf
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Gilles Dartiguelongue e...@gentoo.org wrote:
I don't think making a list for each arch is going to make anything any
easier for maintainers requesting stabilization, which means those list
we need more time to generate before being released. You just move the
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@gmail.com wrote:
Il giorno ven, 11/02/2011 alle 16.51 -0300, Alexis Ballier ha scritto:
you are seriously considering patching every single package using
libpng like
this instead of fixing those that fail??? (and i'm not talking
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Antoni Grzymala awa...@chopin.edu.pl wrote:
Samuli Suominen dixit (2011-02-01, 21:09):
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (01 Feb 2011)
# Masked for QA because the package has not been installable for an year
now.
# See
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
You can't really expect me to take responsibility for a commit I can't
test.
And I don't.
Maybe you did this already, but it seems like the amount of time spent
masking a package could have been spent poking whoever
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:31:20 +0100
Christian Faulhammer fa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi,
over the course of the years the x86 (and other architectures as well)
has given away permissions to maintainers/teams to mark packages
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 2:50 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@gmail.com wrote:
Il giorno mer, 19/01/2011 alle 21.44 -0500, Mike Frysinger ha scritto:
you really need to start off discussions as here is the problem i
perceive
and here is a solution i think will address it. shooting off
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
By the way, we have a nice team of arch and herd testers - how about
encouraging them to wrangle some bugs?
Yeah, I just came here to say this. One certainly doesn't need to have
completed the developer quizzes to
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
[snip]
I agree that this could be better. To me, most of the problems with
this are due to users not knowing which of these should be set for
their particular CPU.
Instead of having defaults set by a profile, I'd like to
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 6:30 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering if we have space already, or if others would feel
strongly about making space for, maintainer notes in packages'
matts...@sempron /usr/portage $ egrep -l 'IUSE=.*minimal' `find -name
'*.ebuild'`
^ shows lots of ebuilds with IUSE=minimal. Instead of having a
minimal use flag for these packages, shouldn't we have, possibly
local, use flags for whatever feature(s) the minimal flag turns off?
Thanks,
Matt
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Panagiotis Christopoulos
pchr...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 11:20 Mon 15 Nov , Christian Faulhammer wrote:
I don't want to stop you, but you are relatively new to the real
keywording business. amd64 at a point had over 30 members and could
not work on the
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:37:51 -0500
Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:00:00 -0500
Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote
Hi,
I'd like to begin stabilizing packages on MIPS. I've gotten acks from
Redhatter, leio, and r0bertz, and Kumba doesn't really care.
What's the best method to go about doing this? Stabilize the system
packages, then remove ~mips from ACCEPT_KEYWORDS in the profiles?
Should we target package
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 06:00:00PM -0500, Matt Turner wrote:
I'd like to begin stabilizing packages on MIPS. I've gotten acks from
Redhatter, leio, and r0bertz, and Kumba doesn't really care.
Out of interest, what MIPS
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:00:00 -0500
Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote:
Should we target package versions that aren't stabilized on other
architectures yet, so that we'll have an extended testing period
before they'll
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Stuart Longland redhat...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 05:40:03PM +0800, David Nelson wrote:
A number of Linux distributions have announced their intention to ship
LibreOffice with their future releases. We know that they frequently
do re-branding
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Stuart Longland redhat...@gentoo.org wrote:
STMicroelectronics MIPS systems (Lemote, Gdium, etc) are becoming more
common, and we should definitely do a better job supporting them. (I
should mention that I've been loaned a Yeelong by Daniel Clark, of
701 - 734 of 734 matches
Mail list logo
