Re: [gentoo-dev] [DRAFT v2] GLEP 84: Standard format for package.mask files

2023-10-13 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2023, Arthur Zamarin wrote: >>> PKGS_GROUP ::= {ATOM}(\n{ATOM})* >> >> Sorry, I had missed this when reading it the first time. Please avoid >> the term "atom" because neither PMS nor the Devmanual calls them so. > Oh, sorry, normal jargon from pkgcore work. How to call

Re: [gentoo-dev] [DRAFT v2] GLEP 84: Standard format for package.mask files

2023-10-13 Thread Arthur Zamarin
On 13/10/2023 21.49, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Fri, 13 Oct 2023, Arthur Zamarin wrote: > >> PKGS_GROUP ::= {ATOM}(\n{ATOM})* > > Sorry, I had missed this when reading it the first time. Please avoid > the term "atom" because neither PMS nor the Devmanual calls them so. Oh, sorry,

Re: [gentoo-dev] [DRAFT v2] GLEP 84: Standard format for package.mask files

2023-10-13 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2023, Arthur Zamarin wrote: > PKGS_GROUP ::= {ATOM}(\n{ATOM})* Sorry, I had missed this when reading it the first time. Please avoid the term "atom" because neither PMS nor the Devmanual calls them so. Ulrich signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] [DRAFT v2] GLEP 84: Standard format for package.mask files

2023-10-13 Thread Arthur Zamarin
This is the second version of the GLEP after previous recommendations and suggestions [1] - thank you for all who participated. Similar to previously, the draft can also be found on glep-0084 branch [2]. [1] https://public-inbox.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/u5y3ky...@gentoo.org/T/ [2]