Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] preserve-libs.eclass: Split off preserve_old_lib from eutils.

On Thu, 4 Jan 2018 10:35:23 -0500 Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 5:23 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > I have seen this is only used by: > > app-arch/xz-utils > > dev-libs/gmp > > dev-libs/libpcre > > dev-libs/mpc > > dev-libs/mpfr > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] preserve-libs.eclass: Split off preserve_old_lib from eutils.

W dniu czw, 04.01.2018 o godzinie 19∶22 +0100, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller napisał: > > > > > > On Thu, 4 Jan 2018, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 5:23 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > I have seen this is only used by: > > > app-arch/xz-utils > > > dev-libs/gmp > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] preserve-libs.eclass: Split off preserve_old_lib from eutils.

> On Thu, 4 Jan 2018, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 5:23 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> I have seen this is only used by: >> app-arch/xz-utils >> dev-libs/gmp >> dev-libs/libpcre >> dev-libs/mpc >> dev-libs/mpfr >> net-nds/openldap >> sys-libs/gdbm >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] preserve-libs.eclass: Split off preserve_old_lib from eutils.

> On Thu, 4 Jan 2018, M J Everitt wrote: > On 04/01/18 11:21, David Seifert wrote: >> Never mind that this has 0 to do with EAPI3/4 or with newer EAPI >> 'features' and is all about the fact that FEATURES=preserve-libs is >> only implemented in Portage, without comparable functionality in >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] preserve-libs.eclass: Split off preserve_old_lib from eutils.

On 04/01/18 11:36, M. J. Everitt wrote: > On 04/01/18 11:21, David Seifert wrote: >> On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 10:43 +, M. J. Everitt wrote: >>> On 04/01/18 10:23, Pacho Ramos wrote: El mié, 03-01-2018 a las 17:13 +0100, Ulrich Müller escribió: > Split off functions preserve_old_lib and

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] preserve-libs.eclass: Split off preserve_old_lib from eutils.

On 04/01/18 11:21, David Seifert wrote: > On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 10:43 +, M. J. Everitt wrote: >> On 04/01/18 10:23, Pacho Ramos wrote: >>> El mié, 03-01-2018 a las 17:13 +0100, Ulrich Müller escribió: Split off functions preserve_old_lib and preserve_old_lib_notify from

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] preserve-libs.eclass: Split off preserve_old_lib from eutils.

On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 10:43 +, M. J. Everitt wrote: > On 04/01/18 10:23, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > El mié, 03-01-2018 a las 17:13 +0100, Ulrich Müller escribió: > > > Split off functions preserve_old_lib and preserve_old_lib_notify > > > from > > > eutils.eclass into a dedicated

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] preserve-libs.eclass: Split off preserve_old_lib from eutils.

On 04/01/18 10:23, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El mié, 03-01-2018 a las 17:13 +0100, Ulrich Müller escribió: >> Split off functions preserve_old_lib and preserve_old_lib_notify from >> eutils.eclass into a dedicated preserve-libs.eclass. These functions >> are rarely used and are independent of the rest

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] preserve-libs.eclass: Split off preserve_old_lib from eutils.

El mié, 03-01-2018 a las 17:13 +0100, Ulrich Müller escribió: > Split off functions preserve_old_lib and preserve_old_lib_notify from > eutils.eclass into a dedicated preserve-libs.eclass. These functions > are rarely used and are independent of the rest of eutils, therefore > moving them into

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] preserve-libs.eclass: Split off preserve_old_lib from eutils.

Split off functions preserve_old_lib and preserve_old_lib_notify from eutils.eclass into a dedicated preserve-libs.eclass. These functions are rarely used and are independent of the rest of eutils, therefore moving them into their own eclass will help clarifying eclass inheritance in ebuilds. For