> On Fri, 01 Mar 2024, Florian Schmaus wrote:
> On 29/02/2024 21.40, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>> On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, Florian Schmaus wrote:
>>
>>> @@ -178,6 +178,10 @@ etexmf-update() {
>>> if has_version 'app-text/texlive-core' ; then
>>> if [[ -z ${ROOT} && -x
On 29/02/2024 21.40, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, Florian Schmaus wrote:
@@ -178,6 +178,10 @@ etexmf-update() {
if has_version 'app-text/texlive-core' ; then
if [[ -z ${ROOT} && -x "${EPREFIX}"/usr/sbin/texmf-update ]] ;
then
> On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, Florian Schmaus wrote:
> @@ -178,6 +178,10 @@ etexmf-update() {
> if has_version 'app-text/texlive-core' ; then
> if [[ -z ${ROOT} && -x "${EPREFIX}"/usr/sbin/texmf-update ]] ;
> then
> "${EPREFIX}"/usr/sbin/texmf-update
> +
The texlive eclasses where traditionally lenient when it comes to the
exit status of texmf-update and fmtutil-sys, as they would return a
non-zero exit status in certain situations, especially when bootstraping
the texlive installation, i.e., when texlive-core is installed.
With the upcoming
