Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] 'Gentoo Linux' bugzilla component reorganization

2016-06-17 Thread Michał Górny
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 14:04:19 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 21:11:30 +0200 > Michał Górny wrote: > > > Right now we have the following components: > > > > - Applications, > > - baselayout, > > - Core system, > > - Development, > > -

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] 'Gentoo Linux' bugzilla component reorganization

2016-06-16 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
> > > Keeping the big pseudo-category split doesn't make much sense as most > > > of the packages can't be fit easily into a specific group and it only > > > confuses users. GNOME & KDE aren't very clear either, especially for > > > non-core packages (like: is systemd a GNOME package?). Having

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] 'Gentoo Linux' bugzilla component reorganization

2016-06-16 Thread Paweł Hajdan , Jr .
On 15/06/16 21:11, Michał Górny wrote: > I would personally go for the following layout: > > - All packages, > - Core system [includes baselayout], > - Eclasses and Profiles, > - GCC Porting, > - Hardened, > - Keywording & Stabilization, > - New packages ('New ebuilds' previously), > - SELinux.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] 'Gentoo Linux' bugzilla component reorganization

2016-06-16 Thread Jason Zaman
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 03:32:03PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 16:18:20 +0300 > Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > > On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 14:04:19 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > > > On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 21:11:30 +0200 > > > Michał Górny wrote: > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] 'Gentoo Linux' bugzilla component reorganization

2016-06-16 Thread Michał Górny
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 09:47:12 -0400 Joshua Kinard wrote: > On 06/16/2016 08:04, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 21:11:30 +0200 > > Michał Górny wrote: > > > >> Right now we have the following components: > >> > >> - Applications, > >> -

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] 'Gentoo Linux' bugzilla component reorganization

2016-06-16 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 06/16/2016 08:04, Michał Górny wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 21:11:30 +0200 > Michał Górny wrote: > >> Right now we have the following components: >> >> - Applications, >> - baselayout, >> - Core system, >> - Development, >> - Eclasses and Profiles, >> - Games, >> - GCC

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] 'Gentoo Linux' bugzilla component reorganization

2016-06-16 Thread Michał Górny
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 16:18:20 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 14:04:19 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 21:11:30 +0200 > > Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > Right now we have the following components: > > > > > > -

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] 'Gentoo Linux' bugzilla component reorganization

2016-06-16 Thread Andrew Savchenko
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 14:04:19 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 21:11:30 +0200 > Michał Górny wrote: > > > Right now we have the following components: > > > > - Applications, > > - baselayout, > > - Core system, > > - Development, > > - Eclasses and Profiles, > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] 'Gentoo Linux' bugzilla component reorganization

2016-06-16 Thread Kent Fredric
On 17 June 2016 at 00:04, Michał Górny wrote: > Revision two: > > - Current packages [bug-wranglers@], > - Eclasses [bug-wranglers@], > - Hardened [hardened@], > - New packages [bug-wranglers@], > - Overlays [overlays@], > - Profiles [bug-wranglers@], > - SELinux [selinux@].

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] 'Gentoo Linux' bugzilla component reorganization

2016-06-16 Thread M. J. Everitt
On 16/06/16 13:04, Michał Górny wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 21:11:30 +0200 > Michał Górny wrote: > >> Right now we have the following components: >> >> - Applications, >> - baselayout, >> - Core system, >> - Development, >> - Eclasses and Profiles, >> - Games, >> - GCC

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] 'Gentoo Linux' bugzilla component reorganization

2016-06-16 Thread Davide Pesavento
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 21:11:30 +0200 > Michał Górny wrote: > >> Right now we have the following components: >> >> - Applications, >> - baselayout, >> - Core system, >> - Development, >> - Eclasses and

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] 'Gentoo Linux' bugzilla component reorganization

2016-06-16 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 21:11:30 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > Right now we have the following components: > > - Applications, > - baselayout, > - Core system, > - Development, > - Eclasses and Profiles, > - Games, > - GCC Porting, > - GNOME, > - Hardened, > - Java, > - KDE, > -

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] 'Gentoo Linux' bugzilla component reorganization

2016-06-16 Thread Mikle Kolyada
15.06.2016 22:11, Michał Górny пишет: Hello, everyone. On bug #577398, Pacho has requested removing the 'Development' component that's rarely used according to its description. However, I'd rather not remove a single component when it fits the component split currently used there. Right now

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] 'Gentoo Linux' bugzilla component reorganization

2016-06-15 Thread Michał Górny
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 00:01:52 +0200 "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote: > > Right now we have the following components: > > > > - Applications, > merge with unspecified Merging is impossible. > > - Core system, > autoassign to base-system? Will base-system handle systemd

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] 'Gentoo Linux' bugzilla component reorganization

2016-06-15 Thread Daniel Campbell
On 06/15/2016 12:11 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, everyone. > > On bug #577398, Pacho has requested removing the 'Development' > component that's rarely used according to its description. However, I'd > rather not remove a single component when it fits the component split > currently used

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] 'Gentoo Linux' bugzilla component reorganization

2016-06-15 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
> Right now we have the following components: > > - Applications, merge with unspecified > - Core system, autoassign to base-system? > - Development, makes no sense, merge with unspecified > - Eclasses and Profiles, split into eclasses and profiles > - Games, merge with applications > -

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] 'Gentoo Linux' bugzilla component reorganization

2016-06-15 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Davide Pesavento wrote: > We could also have separate components for "keywording" vs > "stabilization", which would make the use of STABLEREQ/KEYWORDREQ > keywords obsolete at the same time. The STABLEREQ keyword would still be useful for

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] 'Gentoo Linux' bugzilla component reorganization

2016-06-15 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 21:57:04 +0200 Davide Pesavento wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > I would personally go for the following layout: > > > > - All packages, > > - Core system [includes baselayout], > > - Eclasses and Profiles,

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] 'Gentoo Linux' bugzilla component reorganization

2016-06-15 Thread Davide Pesavento
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > I would personally go for the following layout: > > - All packages, > - Core system [includes baselayout], > - Eclasses and Profiles, > - GCC Porting, > - Hardened, > - Keywording & Stabilization, > - New packages ('New

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] 'Gentoo Linux' bugzilla component reorganization

2016-06-15 Thread Michał Górny
Hello, everyone. On bug #577398, Pacho has requested removing the 'Development' component that's rarely used according to its description. However, I'd rather not remove a single component when it fits the component split currently used there. Right now we have the following components: -