2011/9/20 Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org:
The issue here is that if some part of the tree looses lots of its
maintainers we as devs usually manage to shape it up enough for us in
testing but nobody ever bothers to wait that 30 days and open
stablereq.
An issue your suggestion doesn't
Hi guys,
as I am now messing around libreo I am meeting a lot packages that
none bothered to stablereq since 2009 or so, the versions in ~ are
cleaner, more up to date, and possibly contain less bugs.
The issue here is that if some part of the tree looses lots of its
maintainers we as devs
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 23:18 +0200, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
Well it would be something like priority based queue with maximum 60
points value.
Each update after the month in main tree would get 0 points for
stabilisation, any-developer / maintainer would be able to add up to
40 points to any
2011/9/20 Tony Chainsaw Vroon chain...@gentoo.org:
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 23:18 +0200, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
Well it would be something like priority based queue with maximum 60
points value.
Each update after the month in main tree would get 0 points for
stabilisation, any-developer /
On 09/20/11 23:18, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
[snipped to bits]
So, the issue is obvious, we have packages in testing that are in
better shape than stable ones.
I'm aware that some of my packages could use a stablereq, but since I
don't run any stable machines at the moment it just never bothers me.
