On Mon, 2024-01-08 at 07:51 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > On Sun, 07 Jan 2024, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2024-01-07 at 17:58 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > I cannot really see a delineation between app-text and [dev]-doc.
> > >
> > > For example, packages like psmark,
> On Sun, 07 Jan 2024, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 2024-01-07 at 17:58 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> I cannot really see a delineation between app-text and [dev]-doc.
>>
>> For example, packages like psmark, xmlto, or even texi2html are general
>> format manipulation/conversion tools and
On Sun, 2024-01-07 at 17:58 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > On Sun, 07 Jan 2024, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > Here's another idea, a new dev-doc category (though I suppose we could
> > try to find a better name), dedicated to:
>
> > Tools to generate, convert, view and process
> On Sun, 07 Jan 2024, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> I cannot really see a delineation between app-text and app-doc.
Sorry, this should read "between app-text and dev-doc", of course.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> On Sun, 07 Jan 2024, Michał Górny wrote:
> Here's another idea, a new dev-doc category (though I suppose we could
> try to find a better name), dedicated to:
> Tools to generate, convert, view and process documentation.
> This is notably meant to move software out of app-doc/ which is
>
Hi,
Here's another idea, a new dev-doc category (though I suppose we could
try to find a better name), dedicated to:
Tools to generate, convert, view and process documentation.
This is notably meant to move software out of app-doc/ which is
specifically dedicated to "documentation
