we have many local gpg useflags which basically just enable gpg.
Should we merge these to one global useflag?
Additionally we have a few gpgme useflags.
See also https://bugs.gentoo.org/679634
What are your ideas?
We have also have a bunch of USE=pgp and USE=openpgp, both of which are
more
On 30/12/2023 16.54, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
we have many local gpg useflags which basically just enable gpg.
Should we merge these to one global useflag?
Additionally we have a few gpgme useflags.
See also https://bugs.gentoo.org/679634
What are your ideas?
We have also have a bunch of
> On Sat, 30 Dec 2023, Andreas K Huettel wrote:
>> > we have many local gpg useflags which basically just enable gpg.
>> > Should we merge these to one global useflag?
>> >
>> > Additionally we have a few gpgme useflags.
>> > See also https://bugs.gentoo.org/679634
>> >
>> > What are your
> > we have many local gpg useflags which basically just enable gpg.
> > Should we merge these to one global useflag?
> >
> > Additionally we have a few gpgme useflags.
> > See also https://bugs.gentoo.org/679634
> >
> > What are your ideas?
> >
>
> We have also have a bunch of USE=pgp and
On Sat, 2023-12-30 at 00:41 +0100, Jonas Stein wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> we have many local gpg useflags which basically just enable gpg.
> Should we merge these to one global useflag?
>
> Additionally we have a few gpgme useflags.
> See also https://bugs.gentoo.org/679634
>
> What are your ideas?
Dear all,
we have many local gpg useflags which basically just enable gpg.
Should we merge these to one global useflag?
Additionally we have a few gpgme useflags.
See also https://bugs.gentoo.org/679634
What are your ideas?
--
Best,
Jonas
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
