On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 00:16:29 +0200
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Mike Frysinger wrote:
installing the files unconditionally does fall into the
logrotate/xinetd category, so it should get punted. but people
should not end up with the depends installed all the
Hi,
what is the purpose of this fancy useflag, it controlls install of at
best one or more small sh scripts.
As we do not bother with the logrotate useflag this thing should fall
into the same category.
It is mostly added by the eclass for the feature. Which I for example
didn't notice and forced
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 22:14:08 +0200
Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org wrote:
what is the purpose of this fancy useflag, it controlls install of at
best one or more small sh scripts.
As we do not bother with the logrotate useflag this thing should fall
into the same category.
It is mostly
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 16:22:28 Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 22:14:08 +0200 Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
what is the purpose of this fancy useflag, it controlls install of at
best one or more small sh scripts.
As we do not bother with the logrotate useflag this thing should fall
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 22:14:08 +0200
Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi,
what is the purpose of this fancy useflag, it controlls install of at
best one or more small sh scripts.
As we do not bother with the logrotate useflag this thing should fall
into the same category.
It is
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Mike Frysinger wrote:
installing the files unconditionally does fall into the
logrotate/xinetd category, so it should get punted. but people
should not end up with the depends installed all the time.
The eclass currently has RDEPEND=app-admin/eselect and
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 18:16:29 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Mike Frysinger wrote:
installing the files unconditionally does fall into the
logrotate/xinetd category, so it should get punted. but people
should not end up with the depends installed all the time.
And
