[2023-01-18 20:48:56-0500] Joshua Kinard:
So is adding a default definition of TZ to our base system /etc/profile
something we want to look at? I
haven't tried any other methods of benchmarking to see if not making those
additional syscalls is just placebo
or if there are actual impacts.
On Wed, 2023-01-18 at 20:48 -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>
> So is adding a default definition of TZ to our base system
> /etc/profile something we want to look at? I
> haven't tried any other methods of benchmarking to see if not making
> those additional syscalls is just placebo
> or if there
Michał Górny writes:
> On Wed, 2023-01-18 at 20:48 -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>> So this article[1] from 2017 popped up again on the tech radar via
>> hackernews[2] and a few other sites[3]. It
>> annotates how if the envvar TZ is undefined on a Linux system, it causes
>> glibc to generate
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 08:48:56PM -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>
> So this article[1] from 2017 popped up again on the tech radar via
> hackernews[2] and a few other sites[3]. It
> annotates how if the envvar TZ is undefined on a Linux system, it causes
> glibc to generate a number of
>
On Wed, 2023-01-18 at 20:48 -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> So this article[1] from 2017 popped up again on the tech radar via
> hackernews[2] and a few other sites[3]. It
> annotates how if the envvar TZ is undefined on a Linux system, it causes
> glibc to generate a number of
> additional
So this article[1] from 2017 popped up again on the tech radar via hackernews[2] and a few other sites[3]. It
annotates how if the envvar TZ is undefined on a Linux system, it causes glibc to generate a number of
additional syscalls, mainly stat-related calls (in my tests, newfstatat()). If
