On 1/12/13 11:49 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
for January.
Oops, today I've tried my _separate_ script to file stabilization bugs
based on a generated list of packages to support that workflow.
Now the bug is that the list
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:22:13 +0100
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
I can actually batch invalidate all of them. This will generate some
further bug spam (I apologize), but can save your time dealing with
the mess. Please let me know what's your preference.
The URL field is
On Wednesday, January 16, 2013 07:14:12 PM Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
Dne So 12. ledna 2013 14:49:52, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. napsal(a):
Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
for January.
I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the
same
On 13.1.2013 0.49, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
for January.
I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the
same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to
keep the stable
2013/1/22 Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org:
I have an RSS feed for this purpose at:
http://gentoo.petteriraty.eu/stable.rss
Sources are available here:
https://github.com/betelgeuse/scripts/blob/master/rss-changelog
Maybe this is something that should be pushed to official Gentoo
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 13.1.2013 0.49, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
for January.
I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the
same time I also
Dne So 12. ledna 2013 14:49:52, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. napsal(a):
Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
for January.
I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the
same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to
On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 14:49:52 -0800
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
Please review attached automatically generated stabilization
candidates for January.
# tomjbe
media-libs/hamlib-1.2.15.3
media-radio/tlf-1.1.5
media-radio/xastir-2.0.4
are good to go. I put stable requests in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/12/2013 05:49 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
for January.
I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the
same time I also received lots of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/12/2013 11:49 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
Please review attached automatically generated stabilization
candidates for January.
cool
I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at
the same time I also received lots of
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
net-wireless/b43-fwcutter-017
be my guest, although I prefer the bugs personally.
That's what he's doing... asking maintainers if it's okay to open
stabilization bugs for their packages.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/16/2013 01:09 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
honestly this list is such a tinderbox that I hardly read it. I actually
missed the email at first and had to go back in the thread when I saw a
lot of responses. Hence, I would prefer to get bugs than
honestly this list is such a tinderbox that I hardly read it. I actually
missed the email at first and had to go back in the thread when I saw a
lot of responses. Hence, I would prefer to get bugs than random emails
that I have to search through.
So ignore it and he'll open bugs just the
13.01.2013 02:49, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
for January.
# pinkbyte
app-shells/ccsh-0.0.4-r3
app-shells/rrs-1.70-r1
dev-libs/jthread-1.3.1
Ok for them
# netmon
dev-libs/geoip-1.4.8-r2
Ok for it
And thanks for
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 02:49:52PM -0800, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
# robbat2
app-admin/diradm-2.9.7.1
+1
# robbat2
app-shells/localshell-1.3.4
+1
# netmon
dev-libs/geoip-1.4.8-r2
+0.5 looking for another vote
# base-system
sys-apps/irqbalance-1.0.5
+1
# base-system
On 15/01/2013 20:05, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
sys-libs/freeipmi-1.2.3-r1
+0.5
I'd really prefer to see 1.2.2 or 1.2.3 stable first, given the history
with FreeIPMI, I don't aim for too many stable candidates...
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu —
On 12 January 2013 22:49, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
for January.
I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the
same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
I think the best way to proceed is to listen to that feedback and
continue the effort, while also keeping an updated list of exclusions
for packagers/herds that are actively stabilized by maintainers.
I filed
On 14:49 Sat 12 Jan , Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
for January.
I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the
same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to
keep the
13.01.2013 02:49, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
Please review attached automatically generated stabilizatiocandidates
for January.
# mpagano kernel-misc
sys-kernel/linux-docs-3.6.
I'll do this for the just committed version linux-docs-3.6.11. What I will do
for now on is change our stabilization
Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
for January.
I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the
same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to
keep the stable tree more up-to-date.
I think the best way to
21 matches
Mail list logo
