Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: leechcraft

2017-02-02 Thread Daniel Campbell
On 01/31/2017 09:08 AM, David Seifert wrote: > On Tue, 2017-01-31 at 17:34 +0100, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >> On 01/31/2017 03:50 PM, Georg Rudoy wrote: >>> I'll make a new release of leechcraft itself and bump the version >>> to >>> that new one, so they'll naturally be dropped to unstable,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: leechcraft

2017-01-31 Thread David Seifert
On Tue, 2017-01-31 at 17:34 +0100, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 01/31/2017 03:50 PM, Georg Rudoy wrote: > > I'll make a new release of leechcraft itself and bump the version > > to > > that new one, so they'll naturally be dropped to unstable, 0.6.70 > > and > > earlier (if any) indeed could

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: leechcraft

2017-01-31 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 01/31/2017 03:50 PM, Georg Rudoy wrote: > I'll make a new release of leechcraft itself and bump the version to > that new one, so they'll naturally be dropped to unstable, 0.6.70 and > earlier (if any) indeed could be removed. Most of the bugs, as I saw > them, are due to the current last

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: leechcraft

2017-01-31 Thread Davide Pesavento
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Georg Rudoy <0xd34df...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2017-01-31 3:22 GMT-05:00 David Seifert : >> Proxy-maint has always been there, so no real excuse for all those bugs >> rotting away. > > I didn't bother with finding another maint who'd proxy it for me,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: leechcraft

2017-01-31 Thread Georg Rudoy
2017-01-31 3:22 GMT-05:00 David Seifert : > Proxy-maint has always been there, so no real excuse for all those bugs > rotting away. I didn't bother with finding another maint who'd proxy it for me, yeah, that's my bad. > Here's the deal: If you fix all those bugs within the 30

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: leechcraft

2017-01-31 Thread David Seifert
On Mon, 2017-01-30 at 17:43 -0500, Georg Rudoy wrote: > 2017-01-30 13:35 GMT-05:00 David Seifert : > > Please do not resurrect leechcraft unless you're willing to fix the > > bugs with GCC 5 (and GCC 6) and newer dependencies. Personally, I > > feel > > leechcraft should probably

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: leechcraft

2017-01-30 Thread Georg Rudoy
2017-01-30 13:35 GMT-05:00 David Seifert : > Please do not resurrect leechcraft unless you're willing to fix the > bugs with GCC 5 (and GCC 6) and newer dependencies. Personally, I feel > leechcraft should probably live in an overlay instead of the tree. I was previously

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: leechcraft

2017-01-30 Thread David Seifert
Please do not resurrect leechcraft unless you're willing to fix the bugs with GCC 5 (and GCC 6) and newer dependencies. Personally, I feel leechcraft should probably live in an overlay instead of the tree. # David Seifert (30 Jan 2017) # No maintainer activity since git