Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-client/phantomjs and dev-ruby/poltergeist

On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 14:44:44 +0100 Tony Vroon wrote: > We have similar workflow issues with this, and as a consequence our > software team has asked me to step up. I can present an at least vaguely > maintainable ebuild on: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/572824 > > I am aware

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-client/phantomjs and dev-ruby/poltergeist

On 06/06/17 10:11, Kent Fredric wrote: > I'm sort of hoping that we can delay at least until it becomes viable > to use newer stuff on travis. Good afternoon Kent, We have similar workflow issues with this, and as a consequence our software team has asked me to step up. I can present an at least

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-client/phantomjs and dev-ruby/poltergeist

On Sun, 11 Jun 2017 08:38:26 +0200 Hans de Graaff wrote: > I've updated the proposed timeframe in the mask to 90 days. That's reasonable. Thanks :) pgpFU7aP7HlSq.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-client/phantomjs and dev-ruby/poltergeist

On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 21:11 +1200, Kent Fredric wrote: > > Just 30 days to overhaul things on top of other work is a serious > problem for anyone with time issues already. I've updated the proposed timeframe in the mask to 90 days. > ( I only consider my own use of this "amateur" at best right

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-client/phantomjs and dev-ruby/poltergeist

On Tue, 06 Jun 2017 07:28:00 +0200 Hans de Graaff wrote: > What kind of timeframe do you propose? > > > 1.5 Months from "We're not working on this" to "its dead jim, kill > > it from orbit" > > is a bit fast for anything entrenched. > > The problems were there a lot longer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-client/phantomjs and dev-ruby/poltergeist

El lun, 05-06-2017 a las 13:42 -0400, Michael Orlitzky escribió: > On 06/05/2017 07:06 AM, Kent Fredric wrote: > > On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 09:11:27 +0200 > > Hans de Graaff wrote: > > > > > # Hans de Graaff (05 Jun 2017) > > > # Bundles obsolete and vulnerable

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-client/phantomjs and dev-ruby/poltergeist

On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 18:38 +0700, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: > > > Although, in-tree version is obsolete anyway, and upstream made few > next  > releases with brain-exploding buildsystem, so I just pushed > version to my  > "public sandbox" overlay, and happy with it on the projects

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-client/phantomjs and dev-ruby/poltergeist

On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 23:06 +1200, Kent Fredric wrote: > > Can phantomjs be simply masked for a longer period until the > development > world has had an opportunity to catch up? What kind of timeframe do you propose? > 1.5 Months from "We're not working on this" to "its dead jim, kill it > from

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-client/phantomjs and dev-ruby/poltergeist

On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 13:42:50 -0400 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > Hans was > attempting to fix it, but now that upstream is dead, it will remain > insecure forever. IME, as long as that's clear from the pmask, and its clear what those security vectors are, as long as an end user

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-client/phantomjs and dev-ruby/poltergeist

On 06/05/2017 07:06 AM, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 09:11:27 +0200 > Hans de Graaff wrote: > >> # Hans de Graaff (05 Jun 2017) >> # Bundles obsolete and vulnerable webkit version. >> # Upstream has stopped development and recommends using >> #

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-client/phantomjs and dev-ruby/poltergeist

> Can phantomjs be simply masked for a longer period until the development > world has had an opportunity to catch up? Just exactly what I thought. Although, in-tree version is obsolete anyway, and upstream made few next releases with brain-exploding buildsystem, so I just pushed version

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-client/phantomjs and dev-ruby/poltergeist

On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 09:11:27 +0200 Hans de Graaff wrote: > # Hans de Graaff (05 Jun 2017) > # Bundles obsolete and vulnerable webkit version. > # Upstream has stopped development and recommends using > # headless mode in >=www-client/chromium-59. > # Masked

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-client/phantomjs and dev-ruby/poltergeist

# Hans de Graaff (05 Jun 2017) # Bundles obsolete and vulnerable webkit version. # Upstream has stopped development and recommends using # headless mode in >=www-client/chromium-59. # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #589994. www-client/phantomjs dev-ruby/poltergeist