-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 21/06/13 03:53 PM, Alex Xu wrote:
On 21/06/13 03:27 PM, Sergey Popov wrote:
21.06.2013 23:22, Sergey Popov пишет:
2) package has dead upstream, does not build with current
gcc/glibc/binutils/whatever and can not be fixed - bug is
closed as
El jue, 14-02-2013 a las 19:19 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal escribió:
Hi,
I added the bug queries to http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/ based by year of
last
being touched.
Take look, try to close the oldest ones/invalid ones and so on.
I think it is lame we have bugs last touched in 2k5 :-P
2013/6/21 Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org
Could maintainer-wanted assigned bugs be filtered? Otherwise we see a
ton of that kind of bugs that, I think, we already know can become
really old ;)
Thanks!
You can do such yourself. Just clone the repo [1] and commit the updated
links.
Also my
On 21 June 2013 12:44, Tomáš Chvátal tomas.chva...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/6/21 Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org
Could maintainer-wanted assigned bugs be filtered? Otherwise we see a
ton of that kind of bugs that, I think, we already know can become
really old ;)
Thanks!
You can do such
Am Freitag, 21. Juni 2013, 14:50:29 schrieb Markos Chandras:
On 21 June 2013 12:44, Tomáš Chvátal tomas.chva...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/6/21 Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org
Could maintainer-wanted assigned bugs be filtered? Otherwise we see a
ton of that kind of bugs that, I think, we already
Dnia 2013-06-21, o godz. 21:08:45
Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
Am Freitag, 21. Juni 2013, 14:50:29 schrieb Markos Chandras:
That is true. There is nothing special about there m-w bugs. They are
still unresolved bugs, for many years. No need to treat
them differently.
21.06.2013 23:08, Andreas K. Huettel пишет:
Am Freitag, 21. Juni 2013, 14:50:29 schrieb Markos Chandras:
On 21 June 2013 12:44, Tomáš Chvátal tomas.chva...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/6/21 Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org
Could maintainer-wanted assigned bugs be filtered? Otherwise we see a
ton of
21.06.2013 23:22, Sergey Popov пишет:
2) package has dead upstream, does not build with current
gcc/glibc/binutils/whatever and can not be fixed - bug is closed as
OBSOLETE.
Of course i am talking about long-standing bugs, that assigned to
maintainer-wanted@. That's why OBSOLETE seems to be
On 21/06/13 03:27 PM, Sergey Popov wrote:
21.06.2013 23:22, Sergey Popov пишет:
2) package has dead upstream, does not build with current
gcc/glibc/binutils/whatever and can not be fixed - bug is closed as
OBSOLETE.
Of course i am talking about long-standing bugs, that assigned to
2013/2/14 Agostino Sarubbo a...@gentoo.org:
Probably we don't need to see maintainer-wanted stuff..
Oh but we need to see them, quite few of those can be closed as
invalid because the upstream is long ago dead.
Tom
On 14 February 2013 19:26, Tomáš Chvátal tomas.chva...@gmail.com wrote:
Dne Čt 14. února 2013 18:34:10, Markos Chandras napsal(a):
Why not 2011 and 2012 as well?
Feel free to add more, its on qa-scripts git repository.
Ok I was just wondering if there was a reason you did not add them
along
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 1:41 AM, Tomáš Chvátal tomas.chva...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/2/14 Agostino Sarubbo a...@gentoo.org:
Probably we don't need to see maintainer-wanted stuff..
Oh but we need to see them, quite few of those can be closed as
invalid because the upstream is long ago dead.
2013/2/15 Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org:
I was under the impression we just left those bugs open forever...are
we closing them now?
Why should we keep them opened forever. They should be closed when the
package is no longer provided anywhere or obsoleted by something else.
2013/2/15 Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org:
On 14 February 2013 19:26, Tomáš Chvátal tomas.chva...@gmail.com wrote:
Dne Čt 14. února 2013 18:34:10, Markos Chandras napsal(a):
Why not 2011 and 2012 as well?
Feel free to add more, its on qa-scripts git repository.
Ok I was just wondering
Le jeudi 14 février 2013 à 19:19 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal a écrit :
Hi,
I added the bug queries to http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/ based by year of
last
being touched.
Take look, try to close the oldest ones/invalid ones and so on.
I think it is lame we have bugs last touched in 2k5 :-P
2013/2/15 Gilles Dartiguelongue e...@gentoo.org:
On another note, I just saw a report for EAPI per eclass which is super
nice but unfortunately, EAPI=5 is listed but actually unsupported by the
result of the scan :)
This can't be done better right now, as we use pkgcore to gather these
stats
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Tomáš Chvátal tomas.chva...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it is lame we have bugs last touched in 2k5 :-P
Yeah, very useful. I went through most of the Python bugs and cleaned some up.
It looks like there's a *lot* of maintainer-wanted bugs that are very
old. I
Hi,
I added the bug queries to http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/ based by year of last
being touched.
Take look, try to close the oldest ones/invalid ones and so on.
I think it is lame we have bugs last touched in 2k5 :-P
Cheers
Tom
On 14 February 2013 18:19, Tomáš Chvátal tomas.chva...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I added the bug queries to http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/ based by year of last
being touched.
Take look, try to close the oldest ones/invalid ones and so on.
I think it is lame we have bugs last touched in 2k5 :-P
On Thursday 14 February 2013 19:19:52 Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
I added the bug queries to http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/ based by year of
last being touched.
Take look, try to close the oldest ones/invalid ones and so on.
I think it is lame we have bugs last touched in 2k5
Probably we don't
Dne Čt 14. února 2013 18:34:10, Markos Chandras napsal(a):
Why not 2011 and 2012 as well?
Feel free to add more, its on qa-scripts git repository.
21 matches
Mail list logo
