Re: [gentoo-dev] Missing inside metadata.xmls

2022-12-19 Thread Marco Scardovi
>> I know it’s not actually imperative to add it but actually strongly >> suggested to maintain things consistent. What do you think about >> that? Is something You find important to stick? >> > > The problem is that the name is redundant for Gentoo developers. It's > often helpful to have it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Missing inside metadata.xmls

2022-12-19 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On Mon, 2022-12-19 at 22:05 +0100, mscard...@icloud.com wrote: > > I know it’s not actually imperative to add it but actually strongly > suggested to maintain things consistent. What do you think about > that? Is something You find important to stick? > The problem is that the name is redundant

[gentoo-dev] Missing inside metadata.xmls

2022-12-19 Thread mscardovi
Hi everyone! Today I’ve made a simple try to see how many packages miss the pattern inside metadata.xml and the result was rather unexpected. Without counting the category/metadata.xml and maintainer-needed there are 1060 metadata.xml that does not contain it. You can easily verify that using