Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: BCP 47 for L10N?

Michał Górny schrieb: On the other hand, there will be some cost: - If BCP 47 tags containing a script or a variant should be used to generate LINGUAS, they will require explicit mapping. (OTOH, such mapping will also be needed if we stick to Gettext syntax but unify variants like

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: BCP 47 for L10N? (was: News item: LINGUAS USE_EXPAND renamed to L10N)

Dnia 10 czerwca 2016 11:29:41 CEST, Ulrich Mueller napisał(a): >> On Tue, 7 Jun 2016, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > >>> 4. According to Gettext documentation, "'@VARIANT' can denote any >>> kind of characteristics that is not already implied by the language >>> LL and

[gentoo-dev] RFC: BCP 47 for L10N? (was: News item: LINGUAS USE_EXPAND renamed to L10N)

> On Tue, 7 Jun 2016, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: >> 4. According to Gettext documentation, "'@VARIANT' can denote any >> kind of characteristics that is not already implied by the language >> LL and the country CC." (So IIUC the BCP-47 variant "valencia" >> would become "@valencia".)