Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 0/5] RFC: Patches for wxwidgets.eclass

2016-02-03 Thread Justin Lecher (jlec)
On 02/02/16 23:36, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 12:08:28 +0100 > Justin Lecher wrote: > >> while tracking down the following error when running "egencache" >> >> GENTOO.GIT//eclass/wxwidgets.eclass: line 84: get_libdir: command not found >>

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 0/5] RFC: Patches for wxwidgets.eclass

2016-02-03 Thread Ryan Hill
On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 10:21:40 +0100 "Justin Lecher (jlec)" wrote: > On 02/02/16 23:36, Ryan Hill wrote: > > On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 12:08:28 +0100 > > Justin Lecher wrote: > > > >> while tracking down the following error when running "egencache" > >> > >>

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 0/5] RFC: Patches for wxwidgets.eclass

2016-02-03 Thread Ryan Hill
On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 17:07:48 -0800 Daniel Campbell wrote: > I see nothing wrong with discussing changes to parts of the tree that > will affect other developers. Bugzilla is nice and all, but imo it's > more of an AND thing instead of an OR thing. If the bug is already > present,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 0/5] RFC: Patches for wxwidgets.eclass

2016-02-03 Thread Daniel Campbell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/02/2016 02:36 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 12:08:28 +0100 Justin Lecher > wrote: > >> while tracking down the following error when running "egencache" >> >> GENTOO.GIT//eclass/wxwidgets.eclass: line 84:

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 0/5] RFC: Patches for wxwidgets.eclass

2016-02-02 Thread Ryan Hill
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 12:08:28 +0100 Justin Lecher wrote: > while tracking down the following error when running "egencache" > > GENTOO.GIT//eclass/wxwidgets.eclass: line 84: get_libdir: command not found > GENTOO.GIT//eclass/wxwidgets.eclass: line 84: get_libdir: command not