On Sunday 23 October 2011 09:50:04 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
On Sonntag 23 Oktober 2011 15:34:30 Samuli Suominen wrote:
If you only wanted to remove these files, you are free to use
INSTALL_MASK locally instead of downgrading the quality of tree.
Do you have any idea how much time me,
On Sunday 23 October 2011 13:34:20 Duncan wrote:
Interestingly enough, unless I've misunderstood, this issue would be
affected by the recent security-based -fPIC/-fPIE on amd64 by default
discussion as well, since if everything (including static libs) were
built with at least -fPIC as required
On 01/18/2012 01:40 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 23 October 2011 09:50:04 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
On Sonntag 23 Oktober 2011 15:34:30 Samuli Suominen wrote:
If you only wanted to remove these files, you are free to use
INSTALL_MASK locally instead of downgrading the quality of tree.
On Wednesday 18 January 2012 06:42:37 Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 01/18/2012 01:40 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 23 October 2011 09:50:04 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
On Sonntag 23 Oktober 2011 15:34:30 Samuli Suominen wrote:
If you only wanted to remove these files, you are free to use
On 01/18/2012 01:56 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
if you want some touch nuggets to tackle, take a look at the openssl ebuild.
its generation of static archives are less than ideal because the build system
creates one set of objects (all built with PIC), then produces a lib.so and
lib.a from that
On 10/23/2011 03:00 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote:
scarabeus11/10/23 12:00:55
Modified: ChangeLog cdparanoia-3.10.2-r3.ebuild
Log:
Bump to eapi4 and punt static libs.
Time to revert this commit as I don't see anything in the ebuild that
disables building the
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 10/23/2011 03:00 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote:
scarabeus 11/10/23 12:00:55
Modified: ChangeLog cdparanoia-3.10.2-r3.ebuild
Log:
Bump to eapi4 and punt static libs.
Time to revert
On 10/23/2011 04:27 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 10/23/2011 03:00 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote:
scarabeus11/10/23 12:00:55
Modified: ChangeLog cdparanoia-3.10.2-r3.ebuild
Log:
Bump to
On Sonntag 23 Oktober 2011 15:34:30 Samuli Suominen wrote:
If you only wanted to remove these files, you are free to use
INSTALL_MASK locally instead of downgrading the quality of tree.
Do you have any idea how much time me, and aballier spent to make
cdparanoia's build system as clean as
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
If you only wanted to remove these files, you are free to use
INSTALL_MASK locally instead of downgrading the quality of tree.
How is this a quality issue? Why do we have a static-libs USE flag is
packages can't use
2011/10/23 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org:
On 10/23/2011 04:27 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On 10/23/2011 03:00 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote:
scarabeus 11/10/23 12:00:55
Modified:
On 10/23/2011 04:57 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
If you only wanted to remove these files, you are free to use
INSTALL_MASK locally instead of downgrading the quality of tree.
How is this a quality issue? Why do we
On 10/23/2011 05:01 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
2011/10/23 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org:
On 10/23/2011 04:27 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On 10/23/2011 03:00 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote:
scarabeus
Andreas K. Huettel posted on Sun, 23 Oct 2011 15:50:04 +0200 as excerpted:
I'd like to get my standards up to speed, so may I respectfully ask-
what is,
apart from link time, the Gentoo-user-visible difference between *
removing the .a files in the ebuild * and not building them in the first
14 matches
Mail list logo
