Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-user] Re: This nite's switch to full multilib

2015-03-29 Thread Davide Pesavento
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:12 AM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Davide Pesavento p...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: qt is a pretty significant package to have break with multilib, and trying to

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-user] Re: This nite's switch to full multilib

2015-03-29 Thread Rich Freeman
(crossposting to -dev since this is fairly high-impact) On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote: On 30/03/15 03:43, waben...@gmail.com wrote: I also have dev-qt/qtcore-4.8.5-r2 and some other qt packages installed but I had no problems with that. I'm on

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-user] Re: This nite's switch to full multilib

2015-03-29 Thread Davide Pesavento
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: I think we really need to either stabilize 4.8.6, or backport qtchooser/multilib/etc to the current stable version. Backporting is not an option. The introduction of multilib support in qt4 required extensive changes to the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-user] Re: This nite's switch to full multilib

2015-03-29 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Davide Pesavento p...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: qt is a pretty significant package to have break with multilib, and trying to run qt-5 on a stable system is already a nightmare with the qtchooser