On 05/03/2016 11:27 PM, Austin English wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I've been working on the transition from #!/sbin/runscript to
> #!/sbin/openrc-run [1], by starting on the maintainer-needed packages.
> That's done (aside from some stabilizations needed, but I'll deal with that
> latter). The trouble
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Donnerstag, 5. Mai 2016, 21:40:00 schrieb Patrick Lauer:
> > So how many custom init scripts have you deployed that you can't fix
> > with a
> > single Rex command?
>
> I like the naive assumption that I only have one central deployment :)
>
>
On 05/05/2016 08:59 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 5. Mai 2016, 09:53:10 schrieb Patrick Lauer:
> > On 05/05/2016 09:44 AM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> >> On 05/05/16 08:32, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> >>> To summarize: Lots of churn, no visible benefit, except that some OCD
> >>> people
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Donnerstag, 5. Mai 2016, 09:53:10 schrieb Patrick Lauer:
> On 05/05/2016 09:44 AM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> > On 05/05/16 08:32, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> >> To summarize: Lots of churn, no visible benefit, except that some OCD
> >> people could feel
Patrick Lauer posted on Thu, 05 May 2016 09:32:01 +0200 as excerpted:
> So you're saying that a Gentoo-specific change in Gentoo happens because
> the Gentoo maintainer doesn't care about Gentoo? ;)
I'm saying that big-picture, there's more than one distro, and once a
particular package
On 05/05/16 08:53, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>
> This ignores the externalized cost for potentially thousands of users
> that have to fix stuff because it was actively broken.
>
To quote an old proverb .. "you can't make an omelette without breaking
eggs" .. if you wish me to explain, I'll do it
On 05/05/2016 09:44 AM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> On 05/05/16 08:32, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>> To summarize: Lots of churn, no visible benefit, except that some OCD
>> people could feel better: except that we can't actually fix the core
>> 'issue' without making lots of other people very sad.
>>
>>
>>
On 05/05/16 08:32, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> To summarize: Lots of churn, no visible benefit, except that some OCD
> people could feel better: except that we can't actually fix the core
> 'issue' without making lots of other people very sad.
>
>
> Y'all have too much free time ... ;)
>
I'm inclined
On 05/05/2016 09:17 AM, Duncan wrote:
> Patrick Lauer posted on Thu, 05 May 2016 07:13:00 +0200 as excerpted:
>
>> So again, because I feel like either I'm too stupid to understand this,
>> or too smart to let such an obviously bad idea continue:
>>
>> What problem is being solved here?
> For one
On 05/05/16 08:17, Duncan wrote:
> Patrick Lauer posted on Thu, 05 May 2016 07:13:00 +0200 as excerpted:
>
>> So again, because I feel like either I'm too stupid to understand this,
>> or too smart to let such an obviously bad idea continue:
>>
>> What problem is being solved here?
> For one
Patrick Lauer posted on Thu, 05 May 2016 07:13:00 +0200 as excerpted:
> So again, because I feel like either I'm too stupid to understand this,
> or too smart to let such an obviously bad idea continue:
>
> What problem is being solved here?
For one thing, the namespace issue of runscript being
On 04.05.2016 11:19, Duncan wrote:
> Ulrich Mueller posted on Wed, 04 May 2016 10:00:05 +0200 as excerpted:
>
>>> On Wed, 4 May 2016, Austin English wrote:
>>
Your list of affected packages obtained with "git grep" in the Portage
tree will not be complete, since the command won't
Ulrich Mueller posted on Wed, 04 May 2016 10:00:05 +0200 as excerpted:
>> On Wed, 4 May 2016, Austin English wrote:
>
>>> Your list of affected packages obtained with "git grep" in the Portage
>>> tree will not be complete, since the command won't catch any init
>>> scripts installed from
13 matches
Mail list logo
