On 08/11/2015 10:12 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-08-11, o godz. 09:56:55
Dmitry Yu Okunev dyoku...@ut.mephi.ru napisał(a):
On 08/11/2015 12:06 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
3. Too many text, hard to read. Some bugs may refer to a dozen of
URLs.
And how is a dozen numbers better?
Less
Hello.
I'm not a gentoo-dev, so sorry if I shouldn't express my thoughts with
my lame English here. Please tell me if it's so.
On 08/11/2015 12:06 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
3. Too many text, hard to read. Some bugs may refer to a dozen of
URLs.
And how is a dozen numbers better?
Less text,
Dnia 2015-08-11, o godz. 09:56:55
Dmitry Yu Okunev dyoku...@ut.mephi.ru napisał(a):
Hello.
I'm not a gentoo-dev, so sorry if I shouldn't express my thoughts with
my lame English here. Please tell me if it's so.
On 08/11/2015 12:06 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
3. Too many text, hard to read.
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 15:11:02 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
2. Bug number can be easily typed, URL has to be copied or
generated by some tool.
So, please remind me, how many times the 'easy typing' got the bug
number wrong? This is not a real argument, just another of Gentoo's
'I'm
On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 17:02:27 -0700 Daniel Campbell (zlg) wrote:
I don't know about you guys, but I have a smart bookmark in Firefox
where I type bgo xx and it'll take me to the relevant bug. It'd
be trivial to set that up as a bash alias, too. There are tons of ways
to get to a bug; the
Dnia 2015-08-10, o godz. 02:16:01
Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 00:40:44 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
Which is terribly redundant. Just put the whole bug URL. Advantages:
- keeps the bug namespaced to bugs.gentoo.org,
- has the bug no inside,
On 08/09/2015 03:58 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
commit: 40b3fd64ec9c5d6d94f0f0897740bc77622c24a1
Author: Michael Weber xmw AT gentoo DOT org
AuthorDate: Sun Aug 9 13:58:26 2015 +
Commit: Michael Weber xmw AT gentoo DOT org
CommitDate: Sun Aug 9 13:58:26 2015 +
URL:
On 08/09/2015 10:43 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 4:38 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
I don't really see why it has to be so verbose. Can we just make it
bug 557022, or even #557022? That would also make it fit better if
you have a single-line commit message only.
On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 04:43:36PM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
I think X-Gentoo-Bug: 557022 also makes the job easier for tools that
parse commit messages.
I don't. Just the bug prefix should be fine for almost all
purposes, even for tools.
I'm pretty sure the majority of developers
On 08/09/2015 05:03 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 04:43:36PM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
I think X-Gentoo-Bug: 557022 also makes the job easier for tools that
parse commit messages.
I don't. Just the bug prefix should be fine for almost all
purposes, even for tools.
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 4:38 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
I don't really see why it has to be so verbose. Can we just make it
bug 557022, or even #557022? That would also make it fit better if
you have a single-line commit message only.
I think X-Gentoo-Bug: 557022 also makes the
On 9 August 2015 at 15:09, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/09/2015 03:58 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
commit: 40b3fd64ec9c5d6d94f0f0897740bc77622c24a1
Author: Michael Weber xmw AT gentoo DOT org
AuthorDate: Sun Aug 9 13:58:26 2015 +
Commit: Michael Weber xmw AT
On 08/09/2015 05:19 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
Hi!
On Sun, 09 Aug 2015, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 04:43:36PM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
I think X-Gentoo-Bug: 557022 also makes the job easier for tools that
parse commit messages.
I don't. Just the bug prefix
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 11:30 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/09/2015 05:19 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
Hi!
On Sun, 09 Aug 2015, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 04:43:36PM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
I think X-Gentoo-Bug: 557022 also makes the job easier for
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 4:09 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
I was wondering if we should set a standard for referencing bug reports.
The portage team already does something like that:
https://github.com/gentoo/portage/commit/b7149002bf23889f280c502afe6ceda0b1345ca3
Following that, the
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 11:30 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/09/2015 05:19 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
Hi!
On Sun, 09 Aug 2015, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 04:43:36PM +0200, Dirkjan
Dnia 2015-08-09, o godz. 16:09:29
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On 08/09/2015 03:58 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
commit: 40b3fd64ec9c5d6d94f0f0897740bc77622c24a1
Author: Michael Weber xmw AT gentoo DOT org
AuthorDate: Sun Aug 9 13:58:26 2015 +
Commit: Michael
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
X-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=557022
How about just:
Bug-URL: xxx
or Bug: xxx
X- is not recommended as a prefix for the various reasons already
well-stated by the IETF in the previously-linked RFC.
--
As I see it, a lot of people already stuff the bug number into the
summary and I can't really say anything against that. It gives a nice
overview when you look at it:
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/
Given that fact, I am not sure we can convince people to repeat the bug
number in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/09/2015 04:46 PM, hasufell wrote:
As I see it, a lot of people already stuff the bug number into the
summary and I can't really say anything against that. It gives a
nice overview when you look at it:
Dnia 2015-08-09, o godz. 23:01:32
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On 08/09/2015 09:56 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-08-09, o godz. 16:09:29
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On 08/09/2015 03:58 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
commit:
On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 21:56:05 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-08-09, o godz. 16:09:29
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On 08/09/2015 03:58 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
commit: 40b3fd64ec9c5d6d94f0f0897740bc77622c24a1
Author: Michael Weber xmw AT gentoo DOT org
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 00:40:44 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
Which is terribly redundant. Just put the whole bug URL. Advantages:
- keeps the bug namespaced to bugs.gentoo.org,
- has the bug no inside,
- is convenient -- you can click it instead of copy-pasting the no.
1. URL may
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/09/2015 02:11 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-08-09, o godz. 23:01:32 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org
napisał(a):
On 08/09/2015 09:56 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-08-09, o godz. 16:09:29 hasufell
hasuf...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On 08/09/2015 09:56 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-08-09, o godz. 16:09:29
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On 08/09/2015 03:58 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
commit: 40b3fd64ec9c5d6d94f0f0897740bc77622c24a1
Author: Michael Weber xmw AT gentoo DOT org
AuthorDate: Sun Aug 9
Dnia 2015-08-10, o godz. 00:44:09
Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 21:56:05 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-08-09, o godz. 16:09:29
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On 08/09/2015 03:58 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
commit:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/09/2015 11:49 AM, Davide Pesavento wrote:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 11:30 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On 08/09/2015 05:19 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
Hi!
On 10 August 2015 at 11:46, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
As I see it, a lot of people already stuff the bug number into the
summary and I can't really say anything against that. It gives a nice
overview when you look at it:
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/
Given that
On Sun, 2015-08-09 at 17:30 +0200, hasufell wrote:
On 08/09/2015 05:19 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
On Sun, 09 Aug 2015, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
I'd just go with Gentoo-Bug. The X- is pointless since it was
for eXtending Email-Headers. And what we do is only linked in
style.
I'd be
On 08/09/2015 04:26 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 4:09 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
I was wondering if we should set a standard for referencing bug reports.
The portage team already does something like that:
On 08/09/2015 04:43 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 4:38 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
I don't really see why it has to be so verbose. Can we just make it
bug 557022, or even #557022? That would also make it fit better if
you have a single-line commit message only.
Hi!
On Sun, 09 Aug 2015, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 04:43:36PM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
I think X-Gentoo-Bug: 557022 also makes the job easier for tools that
parse commit messages.
I don't. Just the bug prefix should be fine for almost all
purposes, even
32 matches
Mail list logo
