Re: [gentoo-dev] USE flag name collision in use.local.desc "graphite"

On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 09:48:58 -0400 Brian Evans wrote: > If they want to enable a flag to apply system-wide, then it does not > matter where the description is. To users, a USE flag is a USE flag. Terminology wise, this is more a side effect that users are exposed to global

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE flag name collision in use.local.desc "graphite"

On 04/30/2017 06:36 AM, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > Ühel kenal päeval, L, 29.04.2017 kell 22:32, kirjutas Walter Dnes: >> Is it considered a reportable bug? >> >> [i660][waltdnes][~] grep :graphite /usr/portage/profiles/*.desc >> /usr/portage/profiles/use.local.desc:dev-lang/gnat-gpl:graphite - Add

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE flag name collision in use.local.desc "graphite"

Ühel kenal päeval, L, 29.04.2017 kell 22:32, kirjutas Walter Dnes: >   Is it considered a reportable bug? > > [i660][waltdnes][~] grep :graphite /usr/portage/profiles/*.desc > /usr/portage/profiles/use.local.desc:dev-lang/gnat-gpl:graphite - Add > support for the framework for loop optimizations

[gentoo-dev] USE flag name collision in use.local.desc "graphite"

Is it considered a reportable bug? [i660][waltdnes][~] grep :graphite /usr/portage/profiles/*.desc /usr/portage/profiles/use.local.desc:dev-lang/gnat-gpl:graphite - Add support for the framework for loop optimizations based on a polyhedral intermediate representation