On 05/07/2012 11:24 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 05/07/2012 12:18 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Mon, 7 May 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
I propose:
REQUIRED_USE=== ( qt webkit )
But this just means that the ebuild has redundant USE flags, so one of
them shouldn't be in IUSE, in the first
So we have 31 packages that can optionally support webkit, and none of them
lets you choose between the qt and gtk branches at compile time. I fail to
see the benefit of splitting the flag.
---
Jesús Guerrero Botella
El 07/05/2012 05:16, Ben yng...@gmail.com escribió:
On 7 May 2012 08:47,
On 05/07/2012 04:00 AM, hasufell wrote:
On 05/07/2012 02:47 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
2012-05-06 02:34:26 hasufell napisał(a):
# grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l 33
I would vote to make this a global useflag:
webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module
I
On 05/06/2012 05:47 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
2012-05-06 02:34:26 hasufell napisał(a):
# grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l
33
I would vote to make this a global useflag:
webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module
I suggest to use separate qt-webkit (or
On Mon, 07 May 2012 11:11:04 -0700
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
REQUIRED_USE=webkit? ( qt ) !webkit? ( !qt ) qt? ( webkit ) !qt? (
!webkit )
Why do you need to write it both ways?
It's pretty awkward with the existing operators, but we could extend
the REQUIRED_USE syntax to support
On Mon, 07 May 2012, Zac Medico wrote:
Another possible way to model this kind of relationship would be to
us REQUIRED_USE to enforce relationships with the qt and gtk flags:
REQUIRED_USE=webkit? ( qt ) !webkit? ( !qt ) qt? ( webkit ) !qt? (
!webkit )
This line just says that either both
On Mon, 7 May 2012 20:26:08 +0200
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
REQUIRED_USE=^^ ( webkit !qt )
Please provide an algorithm that will turn that into an appropriate
error message for displaying to a user.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 05/07/2012 11:26 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
REQUIRED_USE=webkit? ( gtk ) !webkit? ( !gtk ) gtk? ( webkit ) !gtk? (
!webkit )
It's pretty awkward with the existing operators, but we could extend
the REQUIRED_USE syntax to support an equivalent operator in a
future EAPI.
As far as I can
On Mon, 7 May 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
I propose:
REQUIRED_USE=== ( qt webkit )
But this just means that the ebuild has redundant USE flags, so one of
them shouldn't be in IUSE, in the first place.
Ulrich
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 11:11 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 05/06/2012 05:47 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
2012-05-06 02:34:26 hasufell napisał(a):
# grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l
33
I would vote to make this a global useflag:
webkit - Adds support for the webkit
On 05/07/2012 12:18 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Mon, 7 May 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
I propose:
REQUIRED_USE=== ( qt webkit )
But this just means that the ebuild has redundant USE flags, so one of
them shouldn't be in IUSE, in the first place.
It serves to convey meaning, such
On 05/07/2012 12:33 PM, Stelian Ionescu wrote:
Isn't it the time to make a new EAPI which no longer has USE flags but
USE values ? Many of the really weird USE flags combinations would be
much more clearly expressed if the possible types for a USE variable
were:
1) member-of: for choosing the
On Mon, 07 May 2012 13:24:31 -0700
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 05/07/2012 12:18 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Mon, 7 May 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
I propose:
REQUIRED_USE=== ( qt webkit )
But this just means that the ebuild has redundant USE flags, so one
of
On 05/07/2012 01:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 07 May 2012 13:24:31 -0700
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 05/07/2012 12:18 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Mon, 7 May 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
I propose:
REQUIRED_USE=== ( qt webkit )
But this just means that the ebuild
On Mon, 07 May 2012 14:41:33 -0700
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
What if '!webkit? ( !qt )' also applies though? As an alternative to
listing both constraints separately, you could combine them as '^^ (
webkit !qt )', or add support for '== ( qt webkit )' to make the
expression easier
On 05/06/2012 12:52 PM, Davide Pesavento wrote:
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 2:34 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
# grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l
33
I would vote to make this a global useflag:
webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module
I suggest the following
On Mon, 07 May 2012 14:41:33 -0700
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 05/07/2012 01:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 07 May 2012 13:24:31 -0700
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 05/07/2012 12:18 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Mon, 7 May 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/07/2012 08:50 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 07 May 2012 14:41:33 -0700 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On 05/07/2012 01:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 07 May 2012 13:24:31 -0700 Zac Medico
zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
On
On Mon, 07 May 2012 20:58:18 -0700
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/07/2012 08:50 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 07 May 2012 14:41:33 -0700 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On 05/07/2012 01:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On
On 05/07/2012 09:07 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 07 May 2012 20:58:18 -0700
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/07/2012 08:50 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 07 May 2012 14:41:33 -0700 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/06/2012 02:55 AM, Ben wrote:
On 6 May 2012 08:34, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
# grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l 33
I would vote to make this a global useflag:
webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module
IIRC
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 2:34 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
# grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l
33
I would vote to make this a global useflag:
webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module
I suggest the following description:
Add support for the WebKit HTML
2012-05-06 02:34:26 hasufell napisał(a):
# grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l
33
I would vote to make this a global useflag:
webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module
I suggest to use separate qt-webkit (or webkit-qt) and webkit-gtk USE flags.
--
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar
On 05/07/2012 02:47 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
2012-05-06 02:34:26 hasufell napisał(a):
# grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l 33
I would vote to make this a global useflag:
webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module
I suggest to use separate qt-webkit (or
2012-05-07 03:00:31 hasufell napisał(a):
On 05/07/2012 02:47 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
2012-05-06 02:34:26 hasufell napisał(a):
# grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l 33
I would vote to make this a global useflag:
webkit - Adds support for the webkit
On 7 May 2012 08:47, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfrever@gmail.com wrote:
I suggest to use separate qt-webkit (or webkit-qt) and webkit-gtk USE flags.
I don't think that is necessary.
Ben | yngwin
# grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l
33
I would vote to make this a global useflag:
webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module
On 6 May 2012 08:34, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
# grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l
33
I would vote to make this a global useflag:
webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module
IIRC this was already voted on ~2 years ago (before I retired). It's
just waiting for someone to
28 matches
Mail list logo
