On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:00:49AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 08/19/2015 10:49 AM, hasufell wrote:
On 08/19/2015 07:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote:
I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is
practically useless.
If there
On 08/19/2015 12:48 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Matthew Thode
prometheanf...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/19/2015 12:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote:
I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is
practically
On 08/19/2015 10:49 AM, hasufell wrote:
On 08/19/2015 07:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote:
I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is
practically useless.
If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer about his
I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is
practically useless.
If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer about his
repoman version (which I believe was the reason for this, unless you
want me to add Package-Manager: paludis-2.4.0 to every commit
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 06:33:16PM +0200, hasufell wrote:
I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is
practically useless.
If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer about his
repoman version (which I believe was the reason for this, unless you
On 19.08.2015 18:33, hasufell wrote:
I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is
practically useless.
If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer about his
repoman version (which I believe was the reason for this, unless you
want me to add
On 08/19/2015 07:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote:
I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is
practically useless.
If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer about his
repoman version (which I believe was the
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Matthew Thode
prometheanf...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/19/2015 12:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote:
I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is
practically useless.
If there has been a problem with a
On 08/19/2015 08:00 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
On 08/19/2015 12:48 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Matthew Thode
prometheanf...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/19/2015 12:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote:
I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed,
On 08/19/2015 08:00 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 08/19/2015 10:49 AM, hasufell wrote:
And how often was that useful in practice?
Well, there haven't been any EAPI bumps lately. However, in the time
that follows an EAPI bump, it can be very useful if there are new
dependency features that
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:09 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
Signed-off-by has a completely different purpose which is not part of
our workflow, so that tag is pretty useless to us most of the time.
See https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Talk:Gentoo_git_workflow#Sign-Off
I agree.
On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote:
I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is
practically useless.
If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer about his
repoman version (which I believe was the reason for this, unless you
want me to add
V
On 08/19/2015 12:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote:
I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is
practically useless.
If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer about his
repoman version (which I believe was the
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 14:24:24 -0400
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:09 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
Signed-off-by has a completely different purpose which is not part
of our workflow, so that tag is pretty useless to us most of the
time.
See
On 08/19/2015 11:11 AM, hasufell wrote:
On 08/19/2015 08:00 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 08/19/2015 10:49 AM, hasufell wrote:
And how often was that useful in practice?
Well, there haven't been any EAPI bumps lately. However, in the time
that follows an EAPI bump, it can be very useful if there
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:25:51 -0400
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org
wrote:
It does not other the the metadata.dtd file it checks for updates
and updates itself with. But that is very likely to change with the
rewrite I
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote:
It does not other the the metadata.dtd file it checks for updates and
updates itself with. But that is very likely to change with the
rewrite I have in progress (albeit slowly). I have also seriously been
contemplating
18 matches
Mail list logo
