On Thursday 11 May 2006 02:41, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > yes, it's a user-friendly interface issue:
> > we have *no* *sane* way of doing a debug emerge
>
> I don't find this particular implementation very user-friendly either,
if you read my original e-mail in this thread
On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 22:43 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> no one responded last time about this patch so lets try one more time :P
>
> backend support for FEATURES=debug-build ... no hooks/hacks/etc... included
> here to handle a user interface `emerge --debug-build`
> -mike
I like the basic id
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 11 May 2006 02:41, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> yes, it's a user-friendly interface issue:
>>> we have *no* *sane* way of doing a debug emerge
>> I don't find this particular implementation very user-friendly either,
>
> if you read my ori
On Thursday 11 May 2006 14:23, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Thursday 11 May 2006 02:41, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> >> That's why x-modular.eclass has USE=debug to accomplish the same thing.
> >
> > which is totally wrong
> >
> > read the thread i started on gentoo-dev where i
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 11 May 2006 14:23, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Thursday 11 May 2006 02:41, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
That's why x-modular.eclass has USE=debug to accomplish the same thing.
>>> which is totally wrong
>>>
>>> read the thread i started
