Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Max parallelization setting

2006-10-11 Thread Francesco Riosa
Brian Harring ha scritto: On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 05:27:07PM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 00:04:57 -0700 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I might be daft (likely), but why not just introduce a var indicating max parallelization instead? Tweak portage to

[gentoo-portage-dev] Feature request: --history

2006-10-11 Thread Ioannis Aslanidis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I was doing my usual tests the other day when I noticed that I needed history information upon performed emerges, together with what variables were being used and the success state. I know that the log files are there, however I thought that it

[gentoo-portage-dev] GLEP 14?

2006-10-11 Thread John J Lee
What's the current status of GLEP 14? This wiki page on glsa-check (which seems to have been more or less unchanged for a very long time) has a roadmap: http://gentoo-wiki.com/Glsa-check The implementation will take place in the following order: 1. distribute GLSAs in the portage tree

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] GLEP 14?

2006-10-11 Thread Simon Stelling
John J Lee wrote: So, is there some work that needs to be done on portage before step 3 happens -- i.e. is now the wrong time to be doing that work? Or is it just lack of somebody to do it? In short: No, yes, yes. What really is needed is sets support in portage. See bug 144480 for that.