Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] Depending on "active" version

2007-01-31 Thread Marius Mauch
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:47:26 + Stephen Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:06:51 +0100 > Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The idea is to add a special category (let's call it "active" for > > now) that has the following properties: > > - this category does

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] Depending on "active" version

2007-01-31 Thread Alec Warner
Kevin F. Quinn wrote: > On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:27:10 -0500 > Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Hmm; one could get the same benefit by introducing a new interface >>> (e.g. pkg_env_check()) which is defined to return true if the >>> environment is ok, false otherwise (with some text to s

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] Depending on "active" version

2007-01-31 Thread Kevin F. Quinn
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:27:10 -0500 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hmm; one could get the same benefit by introducing a new interface > > (e.g. pkg_env_check()) which is defined to return true if the > > environment is ok, false otherwise (with some text to stdout, > > perhaps). The pac

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] Depending on "active" version

2007-01-31 Thread Alec Warner
Stephen Bennett wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:06:51 +0100 > Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The idea is to add a special category (let's call it "active" for >> now) that has the following properties: >> - this category doesn't exist in portdir or vdb (= no ebuilds) >> - when portag

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] Depending on "active" version

2007-01-31 Thread Stephen Bennett
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:06:51 +0100 Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The idea is to add a special category (let's call it "active" for > now) that has the following properties: > - this category doesn't exist in portdir or vdb (= no ebuilds) > - when portage ($pkgmanager) encounters a "act

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] Depending on "active" version

2007-01-31 Thread Alec Warner
> > > Hmm; one could get the same benefit by introducing a new interface > (e.g. pkg_env_check()) which is defined to return true if the > environment is ok, false otherwise (with some text to stdout, perhaps). > The package manager would then run this function, after building the > depgraph and

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] Depending on "active" version

2007-01-31 Thread Vlastimil Babka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kevin F. Quinn wrote: > On a general note, introducing dynamic dependencies into the depgraph > worries me, although I'm not sure I can articulate why. Can you articulate "metadata cache"? :) - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP SI