From: Alexander Berntsen alexan...@plaimi.net
Signed-off-by: Alexander Berntsen berna...@gentoo.org
---
Tested Zac's version. Seems to work fine.
man/emerge.1| 3 ++-
pym/_emerge/depgraph.py | 6 --
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man/emerge.1
Signed-off-by: Alexander Berntsen berna...@gentoo.org
---
Add exception in case eselect is not found. Fix output a tiny bit.
pym/_emerge/actions.py | 17 +++--
pym/_emerge/post_emerge.py | 5 -
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Alexander Berntsen berna...@gentoo.org
---
Fix some comment snafus that Arfrever spotted.
pym/_emerge/actions.py | 17 +++--
pym/_emerge/post_emerge.py | 5 -
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/pym/_emerge/actions.py
From: Alexander Berntsen alexan...@plaimi.net
Signed-off-by: Alexander Berntsen berna...@gentoo.org
---
Update manpage header, as pointed out by Arfrever.
man/emerge.1| 5 +++--
pym/_emerge/depgraph.py | 6 --
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git
Hi,
could we have possibility to disable some repoman checks in repo
configs? See e.g. https://github.com/gentoo-science/sci/issues/268
--
Jauhien
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Fixes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=523182
---
bin/phase-functions.sh | 4
bin/phase-helpers.sh | 4
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/bin/phase-functions.sh b/bin/phase-functions.sh
index 9bc3eb5..9117719 100644
--- a/bin/phase-functions.sh
+++
Zac, Michal,
Would you be willing to merge this ?
If env/ instead of package.env is a deal breaker, I can change that.
A bashrc like mechanism is more practical for us but package.env will do
the trick too
and we really want to have this in mainline portage.
Thanks,
Bertrand
On Thu, Sep 18,
On 09/22/2014 08:56 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
Fixes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=523182
---
bin/phase-functions.sh | 4
bin/phase-helpers.sh | 4
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
Your changes appear to correctly fix the specific issue reported in bug
523182. However, I
On 09/22/2014 09:16 AM, Bertrand Simonnet wrote:
Zac, Michal,
Would you be willing to merge this ?
If env/ instead of package.env is a deal breaker, I can change that.
A bashrc like mechanism is more practical for us but package.env will do
the trick too
and we really want to have this in
On 09/22/2014 11:16 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 09/22/2014 09:16 AM, Bertrand Simonnet wrote:
Zac, Michal,
Would you be willing to merge this ?
If env/ instead of package.env is a deal breaker, I can change that.
A bashrc like mechanism is more practical for us but package.env will do
the
On 09/22/2014 05:44 AM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
Hi,
could we have possibility to disable some repoman checks in repo
configs? See e.g. https://github.com/gentoo-science/sci/issues/268
--
Jauhien
How about if we add a new field to metadata/layout.conf, containing a
list of identifiers
Did you mean env/ files ? Having a different behaviour for
/etc/portage/package.env and $profile/package.env would be confusing.
Parsing env/ atom/files association in python would be a good idea. We
should get the benefits of both I believe.
The list of files to be sourced by bash could contain
On 09/22/2014 11:43 AM, Bertrand Simonnet wrote:
Did you mean env/ files ?
Yes.
Having a different behaviour for
/etc/portage/package.env and $profile/package.env would be confusing.
We could call package.bashenv (or something like that), in order to make
the difference from package.env
Sounds good :)
Michal, would that work for you ? If so, I'll start on it tomorrow.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 09/22/2014 11:43 AM, Bertrand Simonnet wrote:
Did you mean env/ files ?
Yes.
Having a different behaviour for
14 matches
Mail list logo
