[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] repoman: handle removed packages in vcs_files_to_cps (bug 546010)

2015-04-08 Thread Zac Medico
Make vcs_files_to_cps exclude packages that have been removed, since calling code assumes that the packages exist. X-Gentoo-Bug: 546010 X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=546010 --- bin/repoman | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Dynamic USE dependencies

2015-04-08 Thread Martin Vaeth
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: Keep in mind that keeping track of past decisions made by portage does not require user-editable config files in /etc. Yes, but you might not always agree with portage's decisions, and the resolution might be non-unique. Although the user might always

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH] Enable cgroup, ipc-sandbox network-sandbox by default

2015-04-08 Thread Zac Medico
On 04/08/2015 07:03 AM, Martin Vaeth wrote: Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: All the features degrade gracefully when the relevant kernel features are not available. In conncetion with some old version of rescuecd, and fetching files, one can run into troubles with FEATURES=cgroups

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH] Enable cgroup, ipc-sandbox network-sandbox by default

2015-04-08 Thread Martin Vaeth
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: All the features degrade gracefully when the relevant kernel features are not available. In conncetion with some old version of rescuecd, and fetching files, one can run into troubles with FEATURES=cgroups

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Dynamic USE dependencies

2015-04-08 Thread Martin Vaeth
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: 1. They can STILL populate /etc/portage/package.use 2. They could manually install a package with one-time specified USE Why do we need another mechanism to control what flags a package gets installed We do not *need* it. By why reject it if you can